Confused about Finding the Green Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of finding the Green Function for differential equations, particularly focusing on the conditions and methods required to solve for the Green Function given specific initial conditions and forcing functions. Participants explore the implications of continuity, the role of the delta function, and the application of boundary conditions in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes setting up a differential equation with a delta function as the forcing term and expresses confusion about the conditions needed to solve for the Green Function.
  • Another participant suggests that the symmetry of the delta distribution should alleviate some confusion regarding the variables involved.
  • A participant mentions that continuity at the point of interest may not always hold and emphasizes the need to differentiate the Green's function to identify necessary conditions.
  • One participant provides a specific example of a differential equation and outlines their approach to finding the Green Function, noting difficulties in determining constants and evaluating integrals.
  • Another participant critiques the approach taken by the previous poster and suggests simplifying the problem by setting certain variables to zero to reduce complexity.
  • A later reply offers a detailed solution to a similar problem, demonstrating the use of the Laplace Transform and convolution to derive the Green Function, while also addressing the forcing function's impact on the solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the continuity of the Green Function and the conditions necessary for solving the differential equations. There is no consensus on the best approach to take, and multiple competing views on the methodology remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the specific differential equation being solved is not always clear, which may lead to confusion in applying the correct methods. Additionally, the discussion highlights the importance of initial conditions and the role of the delta function in shaping the solutions, but these aspects remain unresolved in terms of their implications for the Green Function.

Summer95
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a differential equation with initial conditions ##y_{0}=y^{\prime}_{0}=0## and we need to solve it using a Green Function. Then we set up our differential equation with the right side "forcing function" as ##\delta(t^{\prime}-t)## (or with ##t^{\prime}## and ##t## switched I'm a little confused about that) and want to solve this for the Green Function.

So what I have been trying to do is solve it for ##t<t^{\prime}## in which case the boundary conditions at ##0## apply. Then solve it for ##t>t^{\prime}## (without the boundary conditions at 0). And apply a continuity condition at ##t^{\prime}## kind of like ##G(t^{\prime},t^{\prime})=G(t^{\prime},t^{\prime})##. I know I am supposed to be able to find all of the constants (in terms of ##t^{\prime}##), but there are not enough conditions on this solution to find all of them. What am I missing?

Thank you very much in advance! I would be happy to also ask in terms of a specific example but I'm afraid it would be removed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Summer95 said:
or with t′t′t^{\prime} and ttt switched I'm a little confused about that
Don't be, the delta distribution is symmetric.

Summer95 said:
So what I have been trying to do is solve it for t<t′t<t′tt^{\prime} (without the boundary conditions at 0). And apply a continuity condition at t′t′t^{\prime} kind of like G(t′,t′)=G(t′,t′)G(t′,t′)=G(t′,t′)G(t^{\prime},t^{\prime})=G(t^{\prime},t^{\prime}). I know I am supposed to be able to find all of the constants (in terms of t′t′t^{\prime}), but there are not enough conditions on this solution to find all of them. What am I missing?
This depends on the problem you are trying to solve. It is not certain that you will get continuity. You need to take the derivative of your Green's function and identify which terms need to be zero. Hint: You already know your Green's function is zero for t<t', write the Green's function on the form G(t,t') = H(t-t') g(t,t'), insert it into the differential equation and identify the conditions g(t,t') has to fulfil at t=t'.
 
Orodruin said:
Don't be, the delta distribution is symmetric.
Ok, good! That makes sense.

Unfortunately I am still not getting it, when I assume continuity at ##t^{\prime}## I seem to be able to get one of the constants pretty successfully. I get ##G(t,t^{\prime})=C*sin\omega(t-t^{\prime})## When I try to use your hint I just end up with identities that don't tell me anything about ##g(t,t^{\prime})##.
 
Summer95 said:
Ok, good! That makes sense.

Unfortunately I am still not getting it, when I assume continuity at ##t^{\prime}## I seem to be able to get one of the constants pretty successfully. I get ##G(t,t^{\prime})=C*sin\omega(t-t^{\prime})## When I try to use your hint I just end up with identities that don't tell me anything about ##g(t,t^{\prime})##.
You still have not told us which differential equation you have ... based on your Green's function, I would say you have the harmonic oscillator, but how can we know if you do not tell us?

Why don't you show us what you get when you make the ansatz ##G(t,t') = H(t-t') g(t,t')##? Remember that ##H' = \delta## and that ##\delta'## is also a non-zero distribution.
 
Here is a different example of one of the problems I can't solve: ##y^{\prime \prime}+2y^{\prime}+y=f(t)## with initial conditions ##y_{0}=y^{\prime}_{0}=0## and ##f(t)=\begin{cases}
1 & \text{if } 0<t<a \\
0 & \text{if } t>a
\end{cases}##

##\frac {d^{2}} {dt^{2}} G(t,t^{\prime})+2\frac {d} {dt} G(t,t^{\prime})+G(t,t^{\prime})=\delta(t-t^{\prime})## of course if ##t\neq t^{\prime}## then ##\frac {d^{2}} {dt^{2}} G(t,t^{\prime})+2\frac {d} {dt} G(t,t^{\prime})+G(t,t^{\prime})=0## which has the general solution ##G(t,t^{\prime})=(At+B)e^{-t}##

If ##t<t^{\prime} ## then from the initial conditions ##0=Be^{-t} \rightarrow## ##B=0 \rightarrow## and from the other initial condition ##A=0## so ##G(t,t^{\prime})=0##.

If ##t>t^{\prime}## we still have ##G(t,t^{\prime})=(At+B)e^{-t}=(At+B)e^{-t^{\prime}}e^{-(t-t^{\prime})}##

So I tried plugging this into the DE, integrating and then differentiating and then evaluating at ##t=t^{\prime}## from which I obtained ##B=-e^{t^{\prime}}## and then to find A I used ##(At^{\prime}+B)e^{-t^{\prime}}=0## and obtained ##A=e^{-t^{\prime}}/t^{\prime}## but when I use these and try to integrate

##\int_0^t G(t,t^{\prime})dt^{\prime}## (for the ## t<a## case) this is cannot be evaluated so I presume have not found A and B correctly.
 
You are not following the procedure I described.

I also suggest always working with t' = 0 whenever the coefficients are constant. This will save you a lot of writing.
 
Problem:

##y^{\prime \prime}+2y^{\prime}+y=f(t)## with initial conditions ##y_{0}=y′_{0}=0## and ##f(t) = 1 \text{ if } 0<t<a \text{ or } 0 \text{ if } t>a ##

Here is my solution, in case it might help anyone, because I was able to find so few resources on solving these:

Think of the Greens function as the response of the system to a unit impulse at ##t^{\prime}##. This means that to find the Greens function you must solve ##\frac {d^{2}} {dt^{2}}g(t,t^{\prime})+2\frac {d} {dt}g(t,t^{\prime})+g(t,t^{\prime})=\delta(t,t^{\prime})## (The Greens function is ##g(t,t^{\prime})## lower case ##g##)

Take the Laplace Transform of both sides:

##p^{2}G+2pG+G=L(\delta(t,t^{\prime}))## or ##G=\frac {1} {(p+1)(p+1)}L(\delta(t,t^{\prime}))=L(te^{-t})L(\delta(t,t^{\prime}))##

Now use convolution to get ##g##:

##g(t,t^{\prime})=\int_0^t (t-\tau)e^{-(t-\tau)}\delta(\tau-t^{\prime})d\tau=\begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } t<t^{\prime} \\ (t-t^{\prime})e^{-(t-t^{\prime})} & \text{if } t>t^{\prime} \end{cases}##

But we have the forcing function ##f(t)## so imagine you are adding up the responses to some combination of unit functions and

##y(t)=\int_0^\infty g(t,t^{\prime})f(t^{\prime})dt^{\prime}## Compute for ##0<t<a## and ##t>a## separately and the DE is solved.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K