Confused about Practical Physics Skills

  • Thread starter Thread starter thehammer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Skills
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced by physics students in practical lab settings, contrasting their theoretical understanding with practical execution. Participants emphasize the importance of preparation, understanding apparatus, and the skill of troubleshooting experiments. The conversation highlights the commonality of these struggles, referencing the "Pauli Effect" as a humorous acknowledgment of the difficulties in experimental physics. Key strategies include taking careful steps, allowing time for reflection, and accepting the inherent challenges of practical work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics principles and theories
  • Familiarity with laboratory equipment and experimental setups
  • Knowledge of data collection and analysis techniques
  • Experience with troubleshooting and problem-solving in scientific contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective laboratory techniques for physics experiments
  • Learn about the Pauli Effect and its implications in experimental physics
  • Explore methods for improving data collection accuracy in labs
  • Study the importance of repeatability in scientific experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators in experimental science, and anyone interested in improving their practical skills in laboratory settings.

thehammer
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have been on a physics degree course for the past 4 months. This semester we have started a practical techniques module.

In my first semester the classes I took were all theoretical. I had very few problems understanding and implementing the concepts covered and things went quite smoothly; it has always been this way with theory for me.

However, I've found the practical component of this semester hard going sometimes. I feel so clumsy and occasionally get confused in the lab. I had this problem when I did my A levels at college. I would get fairly good results for my theory exams, but when it came to doing the practical exams I would mess up completely.

So what I would like to know is, am I the only one that has this issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Rutherford was famous for destroying experiments!
It was said about some famous theoretical physicist (Bohr?) that while many theoreticians can make an experiment fail by being in the same lab - he could make it fail by being in the same country.

The secret to experiments is to be prepared. Know what you need to measure, how long it will take and how long you have got. Have a plan for what measurements you need at each point, how many points and where they need to be.
Then double check that you have recorded everything you need before moving something.
 
thehammer said:
Hello everyone,

I have been on a physics degree course for the past 4 months. This semester we have started a practical techniques module.

In my first semester the classes I took were all theoretical. I had very few problems understanding and implementing the concepts covered and things went quite smoothly; it has always been this way with theory for me.

However, I've found the practical component of this semester hard going sometimes. I feel so clumsy and occasionally get confused in the lab. I had this problem when I did my A levels at college. I would get fairly good results for my theory exams, but when it came to doing the practical exams I would mess up completely.

So what I would like to know is, am I the only one that has this issue?

Troubleshooting experiments is a learned skill, just like any other. Some people are better than others, same as any other skill. IMO, introductory labs are soul-crushing simply because they are so contrived- if your data does not closely fall upon a pre-determined line, the problem is your data. And if you don't understand how the apparatus works (a fairly common occurrence, unfortunately), you have no way to troubleshoot. This leads to frustration. In useful science, there is no pre-determination, the relevant point for experiments is *repeatibility*.
 
mgb_phys said:
It was said about some famous theoretical physicist (Bohr?) that while many theoreticians can make an experiment fail by being in the same lab - he could make it fail by being in the same country.

I'm pretty sure that was Pauli :)
 
eep said:
I'm pretty sure that was Pauli :)

It's even named after him! The Pauli Effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_effect

I've always wondered about the veracity of this tale, but as a prof of mine once said, "Never underestimate the power of coincidence!"
 
One hint to "get through" this (even if you don't plan on doing experimental work later) is to take steps carefully, and even sit back and rest for a minute or two before proceeding to the next step. In one of my jobs (with the Air Force Research Labs) I had to do some extensive photolithography... and if I messed up certain steps I would lose the work from the previous day or two. I quickly learned it was better to set myself a stopwatch for a minute break in between steps (and just rest on a stool and think about the next step), then to proceed too quickly to the next step (and goof it up). A little technique like that, while slowing down forward progress a bit, prevents what I call "negative progress."
 
It's a problem for everybody. The real world is hard! I recommend not worrying about it, expect it to be hard; and keep on grinding, breaking what you grind, grind again...

If you want an easy life, take media studies...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K