Confused on a Certain Approximation/Expansion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisJM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the approximation method used in Rolf Landauer's 1950 paper regarding the transmission coefficient A in quantum mechanics. The approximation is derived under the condition that a >> K, leading to A being expressed as A = (b/a)^(1/2) to the first order in K. The relationship K = a - b is crucial, and the approximation is validated through the expansion of the square root function, where small values of ε (K/a) are considered. The discussion also introduces B = K/2a, reinforcing that both A and B approach specific limits under the given conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the WKB method.
  • Familiarity with mathematical approximations and Taylor series expansions.
  • Knowledge of transmission coefficients in wavefunctions.
  • Basic grasp of the relationship between propagation constants in potential wells.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the WKB approximation in quantum mechanics for deeper insights.
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions and their applications in physics.
  • Investigate the significance of transmission coefficients in quantum tunneling.
  • Explore the implications of small parameter approximations in mathematical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on wavefunction behavior in potential wells will benefit from this discussion.

ChrisJM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need a quick bit of help for an approximation/expansion used in a paper by Rolf Landauer (1950). The paper deals with the WKB method (Quantum Mechanics) but that is irrelevant to my question. There is an approximation presented as follows:

A = 1 - (K/2a)

K = a - b

If a>>K, then A will be given by:

A = (b/a)^(1/2), to the first order in K

How is this approximation made? This is the entirety of the information provided: it is at the very start of the paper.

I've change a couple variable names (a and b are infact k1 and k2, the propagation constants in a potential well, if anyone is interested). A is the transmission coefficient of a wavefunction. I appreciate any help!

Cheers

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm smells like one of those fishy physicists' "if f(x) = g(x) are equal to first order, they're equal" tricks :)

Where I got, is:
if a >> K then [itex]\epsilon = K/a[/itex] is very small.
And then indeed, in first order,
[tex]\sqrt{1 - \epsilon} = 1 - \frac12 \epsilon + \mathcal O(\epsilon^2) = A + \mathcal O(\epsilon^2)[/tex].
Now if there were a plus instead of a minus,
[tex]1 + \frac{K}{a} = \frac{a + b - a}{a} = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] <br /> and it would have been explained (sort of).<br /> Unfortunately, I think it should be a minus... but maybe this puts you on a track.[/tex]
 
Hmm that could be the right direction.

Another bit I neglected to mention (but may help with the puzzle!), deals with another value B.

B = K/2a

And following the approximation that yields A = (a/b)^(1/2), it implies that this means that B>>A.

This obviously suggests that K/2a is very small, thus A is approximately 1 and B is approximately 0 (which fits with the following discussion). However, I'm still not sure how the approximation of A is done!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K