Graduate Confusion about the Moyal-Weyl twist

  • Thread starter Thread starter gasgas
  • Start date Start date
gasgas
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime

Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra by construction respects the Lie bracket of the tangent space such that v⊗w-w⊗v=[v,w] for all v,w in the tangent space and [.,.] the Lie bracket. As is always done in differential geometry, we may take the basis vector fields to be commutative, which implies that in the enveloping algebra ∂_μ⊗∂_ν=∂_ν⊗∂_μ, i.e. the tensor product that appears in the definition of F is symmetric and contracted with an antisymmetric tensor which should give zero.

Am I misunderstanding something?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
11K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
26K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
8K