MHB Conjugating Subgroups: Proving |X_K| Divides |K|

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I have answered all parts of the following question except for the very last sentence:
'Conclude that the number of elements in X_K is a divisor of |K|.'

View attachment 4366

MY THOUGHTS
Presumably I must argue that ord(K*) divides ord(K).

Clearly Ord(K*) =< ord (K).
Also I can show that for any element Na in K*: ord (Na) divides ord (K)
But this is not sufficient.

N and K are both subgroups of G. But I know nothing of any relationship between N and K other than that they have the identity element in common.

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • QuestionI.jpg
    QuestionI.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 116
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kiwi,

Since $X_K$ is in one-to-one correspondence with $K^*$, it has just as many elements as $K^*$. How many elements are in $K^*$? (Use Problem 8).
 
I don't see how to use question 8 (yet). But does this work?

Define a function g from K to K* such that g(a)=Na
this is an onto homomorphism with Kernel (N intersection K), so by the isomorphism theorem:
K/(N intersection K) is isomorphic to K*

But ord (K/(N intersection K)) divides ord (K)

so ord(K*) divides ord (K)

therefore ord (X_K) divides ord(K)

Edit: that does not work because the isomorphism theorem is not introduced for another 2 chapters.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
750
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K