Connectedness and product of sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter raw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Sets
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the product of two connected sets, M and N, denoted as MxN, is also connected. The context is rooted in topology, specifically concerning the properties of connectedness in product spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to construct a continuous function from M to MxN to explore the implications of MxN being disconnected. Some participants suggest constructing a separation in MxN to demonstrate its impossibility.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various approaches and hints. There is a suggestion that the original poster consider the connected subsets of MxN and their implications for the overall connectedness of the product space.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a theorem regarding homeomorphism and connectedness, which may influence the discussion but is not fully detailed in the posts. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the relevance of homeomorphism in their approach.

raw
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If M is connected and N is connected, prove that MXN must be connected.


Homework Equations


A set M is connected if it has no separation. A separation is 2 nonempty open sets A and B such that A union B is M and A intersection B is the empty set.

If X is connected then f(x) is connected


The Attempt at a Solution

I was thinking of constructing a continuous non-constant function f:M--->MxN and then proving MxN being disconnected implied M or N was disconnected. It's a really rough idea but I'm wondering if I'm heading in the right direction? If not can someone tell me what an easier way to prove this would be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps try to construct a separation in MxN and see why it is impossible.
 
Noesis said:
Perhaps try to construct a separation in MxN and see why it is impossible.

Yes, that is the main thing I'm trying to do. I just want to know what to do to prove that it is impossible.
 
Anyone?
 
My professor gave me the following hint and I think I can figure it out from here. I just want to know why M and N are homeomorphic. It is not in any of the theorems in the book. There is a theorem that says if M is homeomorphic to N and M is connected then N is connected.

"I think that this is the wrong way to approach it. Here's something to think about: MxN has lots of connected subsets -- for example, Mx{y} for any point y in N (since it is homeomorphic to M), and {x}xN, for any x in M (since it is homeomorphic to N). What can you do with them?"
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K