Connection 1-forms to Christoffel symbols

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of Christoffel symbols from connection one-forms in spherical coordinates, specifically using the metric defined as ds^2=dr^2+r^2d\theta^2+r^2\sin^2\theta d\phi^2. The connection one-forms are calculated as ω_{12} = -dθ, ω_{13} = -sinθ dφ, and ω_{23} = cosθ dφ, leading to the conclusion that several Christoffel symbols vanish while others are expressed in terms of 1/r. The discussion highlights the significance of dimensional analysis in understanding the physical dimensions of Christoffel symbols, emphasizing their proportionality to 1/r due to the dimensionality of the spherical coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical coordinates and their metrics
  • Familiarity with connection one-forms and their properties
  • Knowledge of Christoffel symbols and their role in differential geometry
  • Basic principles of dimensional analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Christoffel symbols in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the implications of metric compatibility in Riemannian geometry
  • Explore the relationship between connection one-forms and curvature tensors
  • Investigate the scaling properties of geometric quantities under transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students in advanced geometry or general relativity who are interested in the relationship between connection forms and Christoffel symbols in spherical coordinates.

WendysRules
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
Let the metric be defined as ##ds^2=dr^2+r^2d\theta^2+r^2\sin^2\theta d\phi^2##

Through some calculations, we then see that our connection one forms are ##\omega_{12} = -d \theta## and ##\omega_{21}= d\theta##, ##\omega_{13} = -sin\theta d \phi## and ##\omega_{31} = sin\theta d\phi## ##\omega_{23}=cos\theta d\phi## and ##\omega_{32} = -cos\theta d\phi## (for work, look at: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ctor-in-spherical-coords.903231/#post-5687781)

We can then use the fact that ##\omega^i_j = \Gamma^i_{jk} \sigma^k## to compute the Christoffel symbols.
Notice that if ##i = j## all the Christoffel symbols will vanish due to ##\omega^i_i = 0## thus, right off the bat we know that ##\Gamma^1_{11} = \Gamma^1_{12} = \Gamma^1_{13} = \Gamma^2_{21} = \Gamma^2_{22} = \Gamma^2_{23} = \Gamma^3_{31} = \Gamma^3_{32} = \Gamma^3_{33} = 0##

With metric compabitibility, we know that ##\Gamma^i_{jk} = -\Gamma^i_{kj}## thus... ## \Gamma^1_{21} = \Gamma^1_{31} = \Gamma^2_{12} = \Gamma^2_{32} = \Gamma^3_{13} = \Gamma^3_{23} = 0##

So onto the ones we can calculate, ##\omega^1_2 = -d \theta = \Gamma^1_{21} \sigma^1 + \Gamma^1_{22} \sigma^2 + \Gamma^1_{23} \sigma^3 = 0 + \Gamma^1_{22} r d\theta + \Gamma^1_{23} r\sin\theta d\phi##

The only way for this equation to be true is for##\Gamma^1_{22} = \frac{-1}{r} ## and ##\Gamma^1_{23} = 0 ## We then can set ##\Gamma^1_{32} = 0 ##

Next, ##\omega^1_3 = -sin\theta d \phi = \Gamma^1_{31} \sigma^1 + \Gamma^1_{32} \sigma^2 + \Gamma^1_{33} \sigma^3 = 0 + 0 + \Gamma^1_{33} r\sin\theta d\phi## therefore, we see that ##\Gamma^1_{33} = \frac{-1}{r}##Next, ##\omega^2_3 = cos\theta d\phi = \Gamma^2_{31} \sigma^1 + \Gamma^2_{32} \sigma^2 + \Gamma^2_{33} \sigma^3 = \Gamma^2_{31} dr + \Gamma^2_{33} r\sin\theta d\phi## To make this true, we then see that ##\Gamma^2_{31} = 0 ## and ##\Gamma^2_{33} = \frac{\cos\theta}{r\sin\theta} = \frac{\cot\theta}{r} ##

Which raises a red flag! I've never see a Christoffel symbol where we have that r in the denominator for ##\Gamma^{\theta}_{\phi \phi}## so if anyone can point out my error, i'd appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be that I'm so use to seeing people set r=const.=1 that I usually do not see the r?
 
Since your connection one-form is dimensionless (basically as a consequence of using an orthonormal basis), the physical dimension of your Christoffel symbols must be the inverse of the physical dimension of the corresponding ##\sigma^i##. For both ##\sigma^2## and ##\sigma^3##, the physical dimension is ##\mathsf L## and hence the corresponding Christoffel symbols must have physical dimension ##\mathsf L^{-1}##. This means the Christoffel symbols have to be proportional to ##1/r## as ##r## is the only dimensionful parameter you have.

Also note that what you are computing are the Christoffel symbols of the orthonormal basis you have chosen. I would reserve ##\Gamma^\theta_{\phi\phi}## etc for the Christoffel symbols in holonomic basis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WendysRules and lavinia
Orodruin said:
Since your connection one-form is dimensionless (basically as a consequence of using an orthonormal basis), the physical dimension of your Christoffel symbols must be the inverse of the physical dimension of the corresponding ##\sigma^i##. For both ##\sigma^2## and ##\sigma^3##, the physical dimension is ##\mathsf L## and hence the corresponding Christoffel symbols must have physical dimension ##\mathsf L^{-1}##. This means the Christoffel symbols have to be proportional to ##1/r## as ##r## is the only dimensionful parameter you have.

Also note that what you are computing are the Christoffel symbols of the orthonormal basis you have chosen. I would reserve ##\Gamma^\theta_{\phi\phi}## etc for the Christoffel symbols in holonomic basis.
Could you explain this more?
 
lavinia said:
Could you explain this more?
I assume you mean the first part? I guess dimensional analysis is a concept more used in physics. Mathematicians would probably prefer to refer to it as a scaling property when ##r \to kr##. Under this transformation the connection 1-forms do not change, but the expressions for the dual basis vectors ##\sigma^2## and ##\sigma^3## do. In order to maintain the relation between the connection 1-forms, the dual basis vectors, and the Christoffel symbols, the Christoffel symbols ##\Gamma^i_{j2}## and ##\Gamma^i_{j3}## must scale as ##1/r##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lavinia
Thanks. I see now. Nice argument.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K