Consciousness and Reincarnation: A Scientific Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter solipsis
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the philosophical implications of consciousness and reincarnation, questioning whether consciousness can arise from a state of unconsciousness. Participants argue that if consciousness exists before birth, it may be possible to regain consciousness after death, though this is debated. The conversation also touches on the physical nature of existence, suggesting that the atoms that comprise a person are constantly recycled, raising questions about identity and continuity after death. The potential scientific implications of reincarnation are also explored, referencing researchers like Ian Stevenson and Jim Tucker.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of consciousness and its philosophical implications
  • Familiarity with the concept of reincarnation
  • Basic knowledge of atomic theory and matter recycling
  • Awareness of psychological research methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Ian Stevenson and Jim Tucker's studies on reincarnation
  • Explore the philosophical implications of consciousness in relation to physical processes
  • Investigate the scientific perspectives on consciousness and identity
  • Learn about the recycling of matter and its implications for personal identity
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, psychologists, physicists, and anyone interested in the intersections of consciousness, identity, and the potential for reincarnation.

  • #31
Wow seriously, this is as overly speculative as it gets.

Freedom of speech doesn't apply on a privately run forum. There are rules regarding posts like this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Tell me, what sentiments am I hurting? Or what 'mainstream' sciences do u want to back my theory? And when u say posts like 'this', what exactly do u mean...? There is a reason why these posts are here and not in metaphysics section

U are reacting rather strongly to a proposed alternate theory. Do you have anything better to suggest? Ur obviously not puTting it forth.
as for the force from star wars, all imagination has a basis in reality.
 
  • #33
All claims must be backed up by mainstream scienctific publications.

Overly speculative posts and personal theories are not allowed.

These are the forum guidelines.
 
  • #34
If its proof that u want, I will find it for you.
 
  • #35
jarednjames said:
All claims must be backed up by mainstream scienctific publications.

Overly speculative posts and personal theories are not allowed.

These are the forum guidelines.

It's the philosophy forum.

You're overdoing the materialistic human-centric point of view, just a bit. ;)
 
  • #36
jarednjames said:
All claims must be backed up by mainstream scienctific publications.

Overly speculative posts and personal theories are not allowed.

These are the forum guidelines.

There is no possible way in which to back up philosophical "Luft" of any magnitude, coming from anyone (ranging an unknown to giants of philosophy) , with mainstream scientific papers.
 
  • #37
Any post in philosophy regarding science or maths is subject to the same rules of the other forums. Philosophy forum rules, not mine.

The claims made are regarding a "life force" inside all living beings and the differences between being alive and dead. This is a Biology topic and better answers given in the biology forums for the claims made in those posts - to continue discussion here won't provide anything meaningful without someone who can give better input regarding the topic.

As per the posts themselves, they were an alternative hypothesis on the subject and they are specifically banned.

But hey, if the moderators feel the rules can be applied as they see fit and ignored where they don't wish to enforce them then so be it. It just lowers the quality of the forums.
 
  • #38
jarednjames said:
Any post in philosophy regarding science or maths is subject to the same rules of the other forums. Philosophy forum rules, not mine.

The claims made are regarding a "life force" inside all living beings and the differences between being alive and dead. This is a Biology topic and better answers given in the biology forums for the claims made in those posts - to continue discussion here won't provide anything meaningful without someone who can give better input regarding the topic.

As per the posts themselves, they were an alternative hypothesis on the subject and they are specifically banned.

But hey, if the moderators feel the rules can be applied as they see fit and ignored where they don't wish to enforce them then so be it. It just lowers the quality of the forums.

Let moderators handle it. A philosophy forum is the last place where anyone should ask for references from scientific journals. They are as inappropriate as asking a writer of SF literature for scientific papers to abck up his books.

One the other hand, I have to congratulate you for your outstanding conformity and obedience to the rules. I think that any newcomer to those forums should look up to you and learn from your example.
 
  • #39
Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 212 ·
8
Replies
212
Views
45K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
11K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
16K