Conservation of Angular Momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid cylinder merry-go-round with a mass of 250 kg and a radius of 1.9 m, initially spinning at a rate of 1 revolution every 5 seconds. A 40 kg child is sitting at a distance of 1.1 m from the axis, and a second child, weighing 50 kg, runs tangentially at 3 m/s and jumps onto the merry-go-round at its outer edge. The objective is to determine the new rotation rate in revolutions per second, utilizing the principle of conservation of angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the conservation of angular momentum equation, questioning the inclusion of different radii for the children and the initial angular velocity conversion.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing dialogue about the correct setup of the equations, with some participants providing calculations and others requesting detailed steps. A participant acknowledges a potential oversight in the initial angular velocity conversion, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the sharing of complete solutions. There is a focus on ensuring all variables and conditions are accurately represented in the equations.

icf927
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid cylinder merry-go-round of mass 250kg and radius of 1.9m spinning at 1 revolution every 5 seconds has a 40kg child sitting at 1.1m from the axis. A 50kg child, running tangentially at 3m/s, jumps on the merry go round at the outer edge. What is the new rotation rate in rev/s?


Homework Equations


I1ω1=I2ω2


The Attempt at a Solution


(1/2MR^2 +m1r^2)ω1 + (m2r^2)(v/r)=(1/2MR^2 +m1r^2 +m2r^2)ω2
I plugged in all the variables and solved for ω2 and got 0.214 rev/s. Did I set up the equation correctly and come about the right answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The radii are different for the children.

ehild
 
yes I plugged in the different radii. I just forgot to put a 1 and 2 behind them in the equations.
 
Could you please show your calculations in detail?

ehild
 
(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2)(1.256637061rad/s)+((50kg)(1.9m)^2(3m/s/1.9m)=(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2+(40kg)(1.1m)^2+(50kg)(1.9m)^2)w2.

solved for angular velocity(w2) and got 0.214rev/s. is this the right set up?
 
icf927 said:
(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2)(1.256637061rad/s)+((50kg)(1.9m)^2(3m/s/1.9m)=(1/2(250kg)(1.9m)^2+(40kg)(1.1m)^2+(50kg)(1.9m)^2)w2.

solved for angular velocity(w2) and got 0.214rev/s. is this the right set up?

You left out the first child on the left hand side.

ehild
 
I did it on paper just forgot to type it on here. When I include the first child on the left hand side, is that the right setup?
 
It is, but I got different result. Show calculations in detail.

ehild
 
Did you change the initial angular velocity from revolution/sec to rad/sec and then change the final answer back to revolutions/sec
 
  • #10
Ops! You are right. I calculated w. So your result is correct.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K