B Conservation of Energy and Momentum in an Explosion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of kinetic energy and momentum during an explosion. A participant questions their calculations regarding the total kinetic energy (KE) before and after an explosion, initially calculating it as (26m)/4 and (18m)/4, respectively. They clarify that the KE of the bomb pieces remains consistent despite the explosion, illustrating this with specific values for KE before and after detonation. The conclusion emphasizes that the total KE remains the same, demonstrating that energy is conserved in the system. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately calculating and understanding energy transformations in explosive events.
JamesG23
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hey, I have a question about explosions and how kinetic energy works during them. I have outlined my question on the attached image. Please let me know if something is wrong or needs clarifying. Thank you.

IMG_2061.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be easier to comment if you had typed up your work. But anyway:

Viewed from the lab frame, you calculated the total KE after the explosion = (26m)/4. Sounds good. Not sure why you set that equal to 4m.

The KE before explosion = (1/2)m(9) = (18m)/4. Subtract that from the KE after the explosion and see what you get.
 
Doc Al said:
It would be easier to comment if you had typed up your work. But anyway:

Viewed from the lab frame, you calculated the total KE after the explosion = (26m)/4. Sounds good. Not sure why you set that equal to 4m.

The KE before explosion = (1/2)m(9) = (18m)/4. Subtract that from the KE after the explosion and see what you get.
Oh shoot I don't know why I simplified like that. Maybe I thought it was 24/6. Thank you
 
JamesG23 said:
I have a question about explosions and how kinetic energy works during them.
In an atmosphere, the explosion of a flying bomb produces a sphere of hot combustion gas that has a very low density compared to the original explosive charge.
That sphere is effectively stopped immediately by it's low mass and the area of it's greater cross-section.
The original KE is not lost, it is just insignificant when applied to the huge mass of atmosphere that encloses the explosion.
 
Let's say the bomb pieces are 10kg each.
KE of each piece at ±2 m/s: 1/2mv2=20J
Total KE of bomb pieces: 40 J

KE of both bomb pieces at +3 m/s before detonation: 90 J
KE of bomb piece at +5m/s: 125 J
KE of bomb piece at +1 m/s: 5 J
Total KE of bomb pieces after explosion: 130 J

But look. 125+5-90 = 40 J
The same as when the bomb is stationary!
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Conservation of momentum and conservation of energy details
Replies
30
Views
2K
I Conservation of Momentum versus Conservation of Velocity
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Conservation of momentum in a closed system
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Colliding balls: Conservation of momentum and changes in kinetic energy?
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Why is KE not conserved when momentum is?
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
Conservation of energy in Gravitation
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
B Energy needed to raise an object to a certain altitude
Replies
7
Views
1K
Law of Conservation of energy and Wnc
Replies
8
Views
2K
Conservation of linear and angular momentum
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top