Conservation of Energy in Elastic Collisions: Solving for Initial Velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of momentum and energy in the context of an explosion of an object moving along the x-axis. Participants are exploring how to determine the initial velocity of the object based on the velocities of the resulting particles after the explosion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering whether to treat the scenario as an elastic collision or a momentum conservation problem. There are discussions about using kinetic energy equations versus momentum equations, and some participants suggest visualizing the velocities as components of a triangle.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem, with some participants questioning the validity of certain calculations and the assumptions regarding directionality of the velocities. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to analyze both x and y components of momentum, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or answer.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the problem's setup, particularly regarding the direction of the original object's motion and the implications of the explosion. There is mention of varying levels of understanding among participants, with one expressing difficulty in following the professor's explanations.

joejoe333
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

On our test today the question said, "An 2 Kg object is moving along the x-axis and explodes, with particle 1, 1 Kg, shooting north at 3 m/s, and particle 2, 1 Kg, traveling 30 degrees north of east at 5 m/s. What was the initial velocity of the object?"

Now I was talking with a friend, and we each came up with two answers:
Would you treat it like an elastic collision, and if so, would you use the kinetic energy or momentum equations?

kinetic energy: ((m1v1i)^2)/2 + ((m2v2i)^2)/2 = ((m1v1f)^2)/2 + ((m2v2f)^2)/2

(2)(v1^2)/2 = (4.5) + (12.5)

v1 = 4.12

OR

m1v1i = m1v1f + m2v2f
2vi = 3 + 5
vi = 4

OR

Would you turn the problem into a triangle; since the velocity is 3 m/s going straight north, and 5 m/s 30 degrees north of east, you can turn it into a right triangle, and the missing side would have to be 4 m/s.

This question has been bugging me all day, until I finally decided to find this site, register, and ask you guys! haha. The answer of 4.00 m/s seems more reasonable, but it's weird that when you use the kinetic energy conservation equation that it ends up as 4.12 and not 4.00. Thank you in advance!

-Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no collision. It's a momentum conservation problem. Simply use that fact for both the x and y direction.
 
Except that, if the original object was moving on the x-axis, with no northward component of velocity, the two products of the explosion cannot have a net northward component as here.

Your calculation:
m1v1i = m1v1f + m2v2f
2vi = 3 + 5
vi = 4
is incorrect- you are treating this as if all velocities were due east. The velocities are not in the same direction.
 
So is 4.11 a wrong answer, as well? Sorry, I'm kind of a n00b, I'm just in 1081 and my professor is straight from China and has an extrememly heavy accent so I have no clue what he says when I talk to him. What you guys are saying, though, is that I would have to solve the both the y and x directions of momentum?
 
joejoe333 said:
So is 4.11 a wrong answer, as well? Sorry, I'm kind of a n00b, I'm just in 1081 and my professor is straight from China and has an extrememly heavy accent so I have no clue what he says when I talk to him. What you guys are saying, though, is that I would have to solve the both the y and x directions of momentum?
There was no need to mention an x-axis in the problem. We tend to think of the x-axis pointing East because of the way we draw maps, but in this problem the x-axis could not possibly have been East. The answer is found, as others have said, by finding both components of momentum before and after the explosion, but since the final velocies are given relative to compass points, do the problem in terms of compass points and forget about x and y.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K