Conservation of energy in Gravitation

AI Thread Summary
In the context of a rocket moving through the gravitational fields of the Sun and Mars, energy conservation is observed in Mars's frame, while the Sun's frame depicts the interaction as an elastic collision. The rocket's velocity changes from v to -(v+2U) in the Sun's frame, illustrating the effects of relative motion. Although Mars is not a perfectly inertial frame due to the rocket's influence, energy conservation can still be analyzed using the common center of mass frame. Elastic collisions are defined by the conservation of kinetic energy and the separation speed remaining constant before and after the collision. Understanding these principles helps clarify the dynamics of gravitational interactions and energy conservation in different reference frames.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Suppose a rocket is moving at radial velocity vr and tangential velocity vt in the Sun's gravitational field. At some time, the rocket enters the gravitational field of Mars (with the above mentioned velocities), and gravitation effects due to the Sun can be ignored. After more time, the rocket leaves the g-field of Mars. Let Mars move at velocity vm with respect to the Sun.

The textbook has claimed that in Mars's frame, the energy of the rocket is conserved, while in the Sun's frame, this event is seen as an elastic collision between Mars and the rocket.

I can see how energy of the rocket is solely conserved in Mars's frame, like how objects in Earth's g-field have their energy conserved basically. But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work? What would be the equations of conservation of momentum/energy? You guys are welcome to introduce new variables to quantify/better illustrate your explanations. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work?
A head on elastic collision with an much heavier object means the speed relative to the heavier object is approximately conserved, just the direction is reversed.

Let v and U be the speeds of rocket and planet moving in opposite directions in the sun's frame. If you simplify the trajectory to a U-turn as shown below:

- In the planet's frame the rocket velocity goes from v+U to -(v+U)
- In the sun's frame the rocket velocity goes from v to -(v+2U)

This is a simple Galilean Transformation (subtracting U from both velocities)

700px-Gravitational_slingshot.svg.png

From: https://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Tutorial:_Gravity_Assist

phantomvommand said:
I can see how energy of the rocket is solely conserved in Mars's frame, like how objects in Earth's g-field have their energy conserved basically.
That is actually an approximation, because Mars is accelerated by the rocket, so its frame is not perfectly inertial. This doesn't matter much for energy, but it does for momentum. You can use the common center of mass frame of Mars and rocket to have conservation of energy and momentum.

phantomvommand said:
But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work? What would be the equations of conservation of momentum/energy?
Here again you have to use the common center of mass frame of Sun, Mars and rocket, to have conservation of energy and momentum.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand and PeroK
Note that elastic collisions also conserve energy, by definition.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
phantomvommand said:
I can see how energy of the rocket is solely conserved in Mars's frame, like how objects in Earth's g-field have their energy conserved basically. But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work? What would be the equations of conservation of momentum/energy? You guys are welcome to introduce new variables to quantify/better illustrate your explanations. Thank you!
Another way to describe an elastic collison is one where the separation speed between the two objects is the same before and after the collision. That implies that the KE of each object is conserved in the frame of the other.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
PeroK said:
Another way to describe an elastic collison is one where the separation speed between the two objects is the same before and after the collision. That implies that the KE of each object is conserved in the frame of the other.

A common analogy is throwing a ball against a wall that is approaching you:
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/basics/primer/

Gravity-Assist-Cartoon-1095x502.png
This is also similar to making an effieicent U-turn with a plane in a moving airmass:

 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top