Conservation of energy in Gravitation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy and momentum in the context of a rocket moving through the gravitational fields of the Sun and Mars. Participants explore the implications of different reference frames, particularly focusing on how energy is conserved in Mars's frame versus the Sun's frame, and the nature of elastic collisions in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a rocket enters Mars's gravitational field with specific velocities and questions how energy conservation is perceived in different frames.
  • Another participant explains that in the Sun's frame, the interaction can be modeled as an elastic collision, where the relative speed of the rocket is conserved in the frame of Mars.
  • It is noted that while energy is conserved in Mars's frame, the frame is not perfectly inertial due to the rocket's influence on Mars, which complicates momentum conservation.
  • Participants discuss the definition of elastic collisions, emphasizing that they conserve kinetic energy and that the separation speed between colliding objects remains constant before and after the collision.
  • One participant provides analogies to clarify the concept of elastic collisions, such as throwing a ball against a moving wall and making a U-turn in a moving airmass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of energy conservation in different frames, with some agreeing on the conservation principles while others highlight complications due to non-inertial frames. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact equations and implications of these principles in the context described.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the inertial nature of frames and the simplifications involved in modeling the interactions between the rocket and Mars. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of momentum conservation in non-inertial frames.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Suppose a rocket is moving at radial velocity vr and tangential velocity vt in the Sun's gravitational field. At some time, the rocket enters the gravitational field of Mars (with the above mentioned velocities), and gravitation effects due to the Sun can be ignored. After more time, the rocket leaves the g-field of Mars. Let Mars move at velocity vm with respect to the Sun.

The textbook has claimed that in Mars's frame, the energy of the rocket is conserved, while in the Sun's frame, this event is seen as an elastic collision between Mars and the rocket.

I can see how energy of the rocket is solely conserved in Mars's frame, like how objects in Earth's g-field have their energy conserved basically. But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work? What would be the equations of conservation of momentum/energy? You guys are welcome to introduce new variables to quantify/better illustrate your explanations. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work?
A head on elastic collision with an much heavier object means the speed relative to the heavier object is approximately conserved, just the direction is reversed.

Let v and U be the speeds of rocket and planet moving in opposite directions in the sun's frame. If you simplify the trajectory to a U-turn as shown below:

- In the planet's frame the rocket velocity goes from v+U to -(v+U)
- In the sun's frame the rocket velocity goes from v to -(v+2U)

This is a simple Galilean Transformation (subtracting U from both velocities)

700px-Gravitational_slingshot.svg.png

From: https://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Tutorial:_Gravity_Assist

phantomvommand said:
I can see how energy of the rocket is solely conserved in Mars's frame, like how objects in Earth's g-field have their energy conserved basically.
That is actually an approximation, because Mars is accelerated by the rocket, so its frame is not perfectly inertial. This doesn't matter much for energy, but it does for momentum. You can use the common center of mass frame of Mars and rocket to have conservation of energy and momentum.

phantomvommand said:
But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work? What would be the equations of conservation of momentum/energy?
Here again you have to use the common center of mass frame of Sun, Mars and rocket, to have conservation of energy and momentum.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand and PeroK
Note that elastic collisions also conserve energy, by definition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand
phantomvommand said:
I can see how energy of the rocket is solely conserved in Mars's frame, like how objects in Earth's g-field have their energy conserved basically. But how does the "elastic collision" in the Sun frame work? What would be the equations of conservation of momentum/energy? You guys are welcome to introduce new variables to quantify/better illustrate your explanations. Thank you!
Another way to describe an elastic collison is one where the separation speed between the two objects is the same before and after the collision. That implies that the KE of each object is conserved in the frame of the other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand
PeroK said:
Another way to describe an elastic collison is one where the separation speed between the two objects is the same before and after the collision. That implies that the KE of each object is conserved in the frame of the other.

A common analogy is throwing a ball against a wall that is approaching you:
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/basics/primer/

Gravity-Assist-Cartoon-1095x502.png
This is also similar to making an effieicent U-turn with a plane in a moving airmass:

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K