Conservation of Energy - Physics 1 Paper Topic Help

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around topic suggestions for a paper on conservation of energy, specifically within the context of a physics class assignment. Participants explore various angles related to astronomy and astrophysics, as well as broader implications of energy conservation in different scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests discussing Newton's vis viva equation as a potential topic.
  • Another proposes exploring the concept of a fixed amount of energy in the universe alongside its expansion, questioning the visibility of energy in the universe.
  • A suggestion is made to examine how the energy of radiation is not always conserved, particularly in the context of redshifted light from distant quasars.
  • Discussion includes the phases of supernova blast waves, specifically the "energy conserving" and "momentum conserving" phases, and the implications of energy conservation in these contexts.
  • One participant mentions analyzing a perpetual motion machine as a topic related to energy conservation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and suggestions for topics, with no consensus on a single direction for the paper. The discussion remains open-ended with various ideas being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some suggestions involve complex concepts that may require further clarification or simplification for a freshman-level understanding. The discussion reflects a range of technical depth and assumptions about the participants' familiarity with the topics.

Pcrouse
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In my calculus bases physics 1 class our teacher assigned us a 4-5 page paper on conservation of energy. He said to talk about a specific topic of our choosing that had to do with conservation of energy. I'm an astronomy/mathematics major, and I was hoping somebody could help me decide on a topic. I really want to do something on astronomy, but I can't seem to find anything that I could write that much about.



Thank you,
Pcrouse
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's vis viva equation.
 
A physics class assigned a paper? One of the reasons I am doing physics is because I don't have to write papers!

You could talk about how our universe supposedly has a fixed amount of energy but is increasing its expansion. Or maybe how we are able to only see some really small percentage of the amount of "stuff" in the universe.
 
My suggestion is for the subject of Astrophysics, not Astronomy. Examine how the energy of radiation is NOT always conserved. Light emitted by a distant quasar is redshifted while traveling for billions of years so that longer wavelengths (lower energy) arrive here at our detectors. So what happened to that difference in energy?

For example, see lots of threads right here in PF on this.
 
Or do a paper on supernova blast waves, and describe what are called the "energy conserving" phase (the "Sedov" phase) and the "momentum conserving" phase (the "snowplow" phase). This may sound technical, but the physics is very simple, and it is interesting that we use language like that even though energy and momentum are always conserved quantities (outside of general relativity, where we don't have a concept of a global inertial reference frame in which to conserve energy and the situation gets pretty technical to say the least). In a nutshell, whenever we say energy is not conserved, we really mean it is going into some form we are not tracking (often heat, or in the supernova case, light from the shocked gas). That might be an interesting tack to take for a paper in any event-- consider some astronomical context where it appears that energy is not being conserved by the behavior witnessed, and then dig a little deeper to figure out where the energy really went to recover the concept of conservation of energy (again avoiding GR!).
 
Ken, the OP is a freshman.
 
It's OK, the energy conserving phase of a supernova blast is nothing but the energy in an ideal gas, given the rate that new gas is piled up into the expanding bubble. I think they can handle that! They are in calculus-based physics, no need to baby them! They don't even need to consider how fast the bubble expands, they can just ask what the temperature inside is, relative to the amount of mass in there. In the "energy-conserving phase", the temperature is inversely proportional to the amount of gas piled up in the bubble, but after that phase is over (the "momentum-conserving phase"), the temperature is much lower than that (because of the light that has escaped from the bubble). That's all there is to it.
 
Last edited:
khemist said:
A physics class assigned a paper? One of the reasons I am doing physics is because I don't have to write papers!

Yes, because physicists never have to write papers in their jobs. :rolleyes:
 
  • #10
If only I could write more papers on my job! Writing a paper for a journal or a conference is a kinda fun. Instead almost all of my writing is in the form of progress reports, proposals, briefing charts, technical reports, documentation, ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K