Conservation of energy question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in a physics problem involving a woman swinging across a 3-meter-wide ravine using a 5-meter-long rope. Key energy transformations include kinetic energy (KE) converting to gravitational potential energy (PE) as she swings upward. The calculations reveal that the height gained when she reaches the far edge of the ravine is approximately 0.83 meters. To successfully swing across the ravine, the woman must achieve a specific initial speed, which can be derived from the energy conservation equations provided.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy (KE = 1/2mv^2)
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy (PE = mgy)
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the initial speed required to swing across the ravine using energy conservation principles.
  • Explore the relationship between height and distance in pendulum motion.
  • Investigate the effects of varying rope lengths on swing dynamics.
  • Review examples of energy conservation in real-world applications, such as amusement park rides.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching energy conservation concepts, and anyone interested in practical applications of mechanics in real-world scenarios.

donkey11
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A 5.0 meter long rope hangs vertically from a tree right at the edge of a ravine. The ravine is 3 meter wide, and a woman wants to use the rope to swing to the other side. She runs as fast as she can, grabs the rope, and swings over the ravine.
a) As she swings what energy conservation takes place?
b) When she is directly over the far edge of the ravine, how much higher is she than when she started?
c)Given your answers in part a and part b, how fast must she be running when she grabs the rope in order to swing all the way across the ravine?

Homework Equations


ke= 1/2mv^2
Ug= mgy




The Attempt at a Solution



a) kinetic to potential
b) 1/2 mv^2= mgy
y= 1/2mv^2/ mg
y= mv/mg
But we don't know V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeah i know i know them but formula would i use for that
 
i don't know the original speed that she grabs it
 
yeah but how do i find theta for that
 
you know two parts of the triangle.

try the pythagorean theorum
 
Last edited:
yeah but is it a triangle ?
 
wont the 5 meters swinging change the length of the hypoteneuse
 
what is the huypotenuse?
 
would be c of pythagoran theorum hich would be the value of 5.83 meters
 
  • #10
you should look at the picture and apply it to your problem. the point of the triangle is where the lady ends up.
 
  • #11
yes i see what you mean by that but what is 2m, is x the 5 meters or is 2m
 
  • #12
2m in your problem is the rope
 
  • #13
okay so now I am lost 2m is the long one and x is the shorter distance 3 meters, how do i find height
 
  • #14
no, x is your height. the width of the ravine is perpendicular to the height and the length of the rope when it's hanging straight down.
 
  • #15
yes i know so assuming i want to use the diagram you gave to solve for X i would take C^2= A^2 + B^2 where C is going to be height nad A is going to length of rope and B is going to be distance across ravine
 
  • #16
is the rope vertical when you get across?
 
  • #17
no i would say it is not because it is attached to one tree, like if i use pythagorean theorum i get a value of 5.83 m so would my height be 0.83 meters
 
  • #18
no. if you look closely, the horizontal line is the distance across the ravine, and the 2m is your rope before you go. what are the other two lines?

hint: the hypotenuse in the picture is 2m
 
  • #19
well simplly is the rope is 5 meters then by what you siad 2m is equal to 5 meters... so my height would be square root of rope^2- Distance ^2
 
  • #20
almost. you are calculating the distance vertically from the top of the tree.
 
  • #21
where should i be calculating the distance from
 
  • #22
like how do you get the value for these
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K