Conservation of energy theorem problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two boxes connected by a massless rope in a frictionless environment, with the goal of determining the speed of one box when it is at a specific height above the ground. The context includes the application of the conservation of energy theorem, specifically relating kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial and final potential energy calculations, questioning the correct application of height in the potential energy formula. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the heights of the two boxes and their respective velocities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the correct interpretation of potential energy and the importance of consistent height references. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of absolute coordinate systems and the significance of change in height.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding the definitions of height and the reference points used in potential energy calculations. There is also mention of differing formulas for potential energy, which may contribute to misunderstandings in the problem setup.

fishingspree2
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 boxes are connected by a massless rope. the system is frictionless
m1 = 3kg
m2 = 5kg
http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/2033/problemwr4.jpg
Find m1's speed when it is 1.8 m above the ground.

Homework Equations


K = 0.5mv^2
U = mg delta y

The Attempt at a Solution


v1=v2 obviously
also, delta y of m1 = 1.8, whereas delta y of m2=-1.8
At the beginning:
Etot = K1 + K2 + U1 + U2
since K1, K2 and U1 are = 0, Etot = U2 = m2*g*5 = 25g

When m1 is 1.8 meters above the ground:
Etot = K1+K2+U1+U2
25g = 0.5m1v2+0.5m2v2+1.8m1g-1.8m2g

solving for v gives 8.37,
but the answer is 2.97
can anyone help me find what is wrong in my reasoning?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
m2 ends up not at -1.8m, but at (5-1.8)m.

Otherwise, you did the right thing.
 
Also, be careful about your velocities. Though it doesn't matter in this problem since velocities are squared, it should be:

[tex] v_1 = -v_2 [/tex]
 
borgwal said:
m2 ends up not at -1.8m, but at (5-1.8)m.

Otherwise, you did the right thing.

I thought that what is important is the difference of height, and not the height itself. since the formula is U = mg delta y.. then delta y = [(5-1.8] - 5] = -1.8
humm can you please tell me where I am mistaken?

EDIT: I also see in the book U=mgh. If I had used this formula I woulnd't have had problems. What is the difference between both? When to use one instead of the other?

thank you
 
You did NOT use the change in height: you wrote down the initial potential energy as mgh_2, with h_2=5m, then in the final potential energy you used h_2=-1.8m. That's inconsistent. Either you use the change in kinetic energy, or you use the correct initial and final potential energies.
 
You have to set an absolute coordinate system and work from there. i.e. the ground is y=0.

The [tex]\Delta y[/tex] is most likely referring to the fact that potential energy is always relative with respect to some reference point. If we set the ground to be y=0 then [tex]\Delta y[/tex] is just y ( [tex]\Delta y = y - 0 = y[/tex].

On the other hand, if we set sea level to be 0 but then do experiments in a city not at sea level, well [tex]\Delta y = y - y_0[/tex] where y_0 is the height above sea level, and y is height with respect to sea level. (Though at this point, it would make more sense to set y_0 to be zero, and take y to be height above the ground you're using).

With this in mind, you can see that [tex]\Delta y[/tex]
is almost always just y.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K