Conservation of linear momentum & center of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which the center of mass (c.o.m) frame of reference remains inertial when two cars, initially moving at constant speeds, begin to accelerate. Participants explore the implications of external forces and the conservation of momentum in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between external forces and the inertial nature of the c.o.m frame, questioning whether Fext=0 is necessary for the c.o.m to remain inertial. Other participants suggest examining the relationship between the accelerations of the cars and the forces acting on them.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some suggesting that if the net external forces equal zero, the c.o.m frame can be considered inertial. There is a recognition of the need to clarify how external forces affect the system and whether momentum is conserved under these conditions. Multiple interpretations of the relationship between forces and momentum conservation are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of friction acting on the cars and how it relates to the inertial nature of the original frame of reference. The participants are also considering the philosophical aspects of momentum conservation in the presence of external forces.

yoni162
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two cars are driving along the road at constant speeds V1, V2. At t=0 they begin to accelerate with constant acceleration a1, a2. Under what circumstances is the center of mass frame of reference inertial?

Homework Equations


Fext=0 ==> change in momentum=0

The Attempt at a Solution


It's known that if there are no external forces acting on a system, the momentum is conserved. The same applies if there are external forces present, but they cancel each other so that the net external force is 0 (correct?). Now, from the center of mass (c.o.m) frame of reference, when the momentum is conserved, the total momentum is 0. Would that apply if despite the fact that there are external forces acting on the cars, if with their acceleration, the velocity of the c.o.m is kept the same (thus making it inertial)? Or is Fext=0 necessary in order for that to happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track, so I will help you see through this. Suppose you are on a skateboard moving along at the velocity of the center of mass before the cars start accelerating. Now at t = 0 they start accelerating. How must the accelerations of the cars be related for you to say that Newton's Laws are obeyed and you need no fictitious external force to explain what you see?
 
kuruman said:
You are on the right track, so I will help you see through this. Suppose you are on a skateboard moving along at the velocity of the center of mass before the cars start accelerating. Now at t = 0 they start accelerating. How must the accelerations of the cars be related for you to say that Newton's Laws are obeyed and you need no fictitious external force to explain what you see?

OK I don't know if that's what you were going for, but I said: in order for the c.o.m frame of reference to remain inertial, we need to have the the net external forces=0.
I know that the net external forces is the velocity of the c.o.m divided by the sum of the masses, and I want it to be 0, meaning (in a one-dimensional case):

m1a1+m2a2=0

Is that true?

Also, how do I explain the fact that the original frame of reference is inertial to begin with, considering there's friction acting on the cars? Or do I say that because V is constant (for each car), the net force is 0 so there's really no problem here, even though the forces are external?
 
yoni162 said:
I know that the net external forces is the velocity of the c.o.m divided by the sum of the masses, and I want it to be 0, meaning (in a one-dimensional case):

m1a1+m2a2=0

Is that true?

It is. If the above condition is satisfied, the center of mass does not accelerate, i.e. it is an inertial frame. Furthermore, an observer in that frame will interpret the above condition to mean that the two cars exert equal and opposite forces on each other in accordance with Newton's 3rd Law, i.e. all forces appear to be internal to the two-car system.

Also, how do I explain the fact that the original frame of reference is inertial to begin with, considering there's friction acting on the cars? Or do I say that because V is constant (for each car), the net force is 0 so there's really no problem here, even though the forces are external?

Correct. A frame is inertial as long as it is not accelerating. When both cars are moving at constant velocity, their center of mass is not accelerating.
 
One more thing I wanted to ask..is there conservation of linear momentum in this case? Since the forces acting on the cars aren't internal forces after all..
 
This is a philosophical question. If you define, strictly, that momentum is conserved as long as the center of mass does not accelerate, yes, linear momentum is conserved. The non-conservation of linear momentum when external forces act on the system comes about when internal forces act in pairs. Here, if m1a1+m2a2=0, internal forces cancel in pairs. Therefore, by the strict definition, linear momentum is conserved. An observer in the CM frame will not be able to tell otherwise although he/she may have to account in some way or another for the action-reaction apparent force between the cars. In accelerating frames, one has to invent fictitious external forces; this is a special case where one has to invent a fictitious internal force.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K