Conservation of Mass Fluids Wave

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity equation for fluid dynamics, specifically in the context of water waves propagating through a channel. The equation presented is $$\partial_t(b(H+\zeta))+\partial_x(bHu)=0$$, which the participants analyze for accuracy. A participant identifies that the term involving disturbance ##\zeta## should not be omitted, as it plays a crucial role in the equation. Ultimately, it is concluded that the wave amplitude ##\zeta## can be approximated as small compared to other terms, justifying the simplification used in the book.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly the continuity equation.
  • Familiarity with wave mechanics and properties of water waves.
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation used in physics, such as partial derivatives.
  • Basic concepts of wave amplitude and period in oscillatory motion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics.
  • Explore the relationship between wave amplitude and wave speed in water waves.
  • Learn about the implications of small perturbations in fluid equations.
  • Investigate the effects of channel geometry on wave propagation.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on fluid dynamics, wave mechanics, and applied mathematics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of continuity equations in the context of water waves.

member 428835
Hi PF! Suppose we have a water wave with mean depth ##H## with disturbance ##\zeta## above/below ##H## propagating through a channel of thickness ##b##. The book parenthetically remarks that the continuity equation becomes $$\partial_t(b(H+\zeta))+\partial_x(bHu)=0.$$ However, when I try deriving this I write $$\partial_t(b(H+\zeta) \Delta x )=ub(H+\zeta)|_x-b(H+\zeta)u|_{x+\Delta x}\implies\\
\partial_t(b(H+\zeta))+\partial_x(b(H+\zeta)u)=0$$ which is not quite what they have. Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What you wrote appears correct to me. This is just a standard continuity equation ## \nabla \cdot \vec{J}+\frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{t}}=0 ## if I'm not mistaken. I don't think you can just drop the ## \zeta ## in the second term.
 
Charles Link said:
What you wrote appears correct to me. This is just a standard continuity equation ## \nabla \cdot \vec{J}+\frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{t}}=0 ## if I'm not mistaken. I don't think you can just drop the ## \zeta ## in the second term.
The book does, though they do say the channel is very long compared to height. Still, I agree with what you wrote, though I doubt the book made a mistake dropping the ##\zeta## since further work requires their version. Edit: I figured it out: I believe ##\zeta \sim A## where ##A## is wave amplitude. Also, ##u\sim A/P## where ##P## is wave period. Then ##uA\sim O(A^2/P)## and is very small relative to ##O(AL/P)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K