Conservation of momentum spaceship problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a conservation of momentum problem involving a spaceship that breaks into three pieces after an antimatter reactor failure. The problem includes calculations related to the masses and velocities of the pieces to determine the momentum of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of momentum equations to find the mass of the third piece and subsequently its velocity. Participants question the calculations and the handling of signs in the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, providing feedback on the setup and suggesting careful consideration of the direction of motion for the pieces. There is a recognition of a potential oversight in the original calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

The problem involves specific values for mass and velocity, and participants are discussing the implications of directionality in momentum calculations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks clarification on their reasoning.

twotoes777
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spaceship of mass 2.00×10^6 kg is cruising at a speed of 6.00×10^6 m/s when the antimatter reactor fails, blowing the ship into three pieces. One section, having a mass of 4.60×10^5 kg, is blown straight backward with a speed of 2.10×10^6 m/s. A second piece, with mass 8.30×10^5 kg, continues forward at 1.30×10^6 m/s.


Homework Equations


P1+P2+P3 = P(system)
m1(v1)+m2(v2)+m3(v3) = m(total)v(total)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, ... I'm thinking this is a conservation of momentum problem... so at first I used the above equations. First off, I tried to find the mass of the third piece (since it's not given, its necessary) which is: M3 = M_t - (m_1 + m_2) = 7.1 x 10^5 kg.

Then, I substituted all of the answers into the final equation, which gives me 1.4 x 10^7 m/s. However, this is wrong. Can anyone point me to what I'm missing?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass looks right to me. Show exactly what you plugged into get your answer for the speed.
 
Clarification..

Thanks for responding!

Here we go...

m1(v1)+m2(v2)+m3(v3) = m(total)v(total)
(4.6*10^5)(2.1*10^6) + (8.3*10^5)(1.3*10^6) + (7.1*10^5)(v3) = 1.2*10^13

(1.2*10^13) - (9.66*10^11+1.079*10^12) = (7.1 *10^5)(v3)

9.955*10^12 = (7.1 *10^5)(v3)

(v3) = 1.4*10^7 :(

I have to be missing something obvious... :(
 
twotoes777 said:
m1(v1)+m2(v2)+m3(v3) = m(total)v(total)
(4.6*10^5)(2.1*10^6) + (8.3*10^5)(1.3*10^6) + (7.1*10^5)(v3) = 1.2*10^13
Careful with signs: The 4.60×10^5 kg piece moves backwards.
 
Oh my goodness, yes, you are right.

Thanks for the help... I got it now, and that makes sense. I was wondering how it would matter if the piece went forward and not backwards.

Thanks again. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K