Conservation principles and particle-particle reactions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on conservation principles in particle-particle reactions, particularly in the context of electron-positron annihilation. Participants confirm that charge, baryon number, and lepton number are conserved in the reaction where an electron and positron produce two photons. They emphasize the importance of checking these conservation laws, as well as energy-momentum conservation, in analyzing particle interactions. A specific example highlights that while charge is conserved, baryon number is not conserved in another proposed reaction involving a neutron and a photon. The conversation concludes with a call for further validation from a particle physics expert.
Jimmy Ridley
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
New poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template in the schoolwork forums
Please can someone help explain these to me? I have completed a-d but I'm not how e works. I thought gamma was an exchange particle so should it then decay further?

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 12.12.01 am.png
    Screen Shot 2018-07-24 at 12.12.01 am.png
    7 KB · Views: 463
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The ##\gamma## is a photon that forms in electron-positron annihilation in part (e). You're supposed to check that charge conservation, lepton number conservation, energy-momentum conservation and others are satisfied in these reactions. For example, the charge conservation in the reaction (e) is okay because both the reactants and products have total electric charge of zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy Ridley
hilbert2 said:
The ##\gamma## is a photon that forms in electron-positron annihilation in part (e). You're supposed to check that charge conservation, lepton number conservation, energy-momentum conservation and others are satisfied in these reactions. For example, the charge conservation in the reaction (e) is okay because both the reactants and products have total electric charge of zero.

okay so for (e)

charge is conserved
baryon number is conserved
and lepton number is conserved?
 
Yes, charge is conserved, and there are no baryons in the reaction so the baryon number is zero on both sides. The electron and positron have electron lepton numbers of 1 and -1, so they also sum to 0. Now you should also show somehow that the four-momentum can be conserved in that relativistic collision where an electron and positron turn into two photons.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy Ridley
hilbert2 said:
Yes, charge is conserved, and there are no baryons in the reaction so the baryon number is zero on both sides. The electron and positron have electron lepton numbers of -1 and 1, so they also sum to 0. Now you should also show somehow that the four-momentum can be conserved in that relativistic collision where an electron and positron turn into two photons.
okay thank you so much, am I also right is saying that (f) is not possible, as

charge is conserved
but baryon number is not conserved as it has baryon number 0 on the left, and 1 on the right? (the neutron has baryon number 1 and the photon has baryon number 0)?
 
Jimmy Ridley said:
charge is conserved
but baryon number is not conserved as it has baryon number 0 on the left, and 1 on the right? (the neutron has baryon number 1 and the photon has baryon number 0)?

It would seem like that to me, but let's wait if someone more professional in particles physics agrees with this.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy Ridley
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K