Considering mechanical engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the selection of mechanical engineering courses for a physics major considering a potential double major or additional classes in mechanical engineering. Participants explore which introductory courses would best help the individual determine their interest in the field, discussing various options such as statics, dynamics, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and math methods for engineers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that dynamics, statics, and thermodynamics are the most interesting and fundamental courses to consider.
  • Others argue that math methods for engineers may not be particularly useful for someone exploring mechanical engineering, viewing it as less relevant compared to other courses.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of taking dynamics, noting its broad applicability across many areas of mechanical engineering.
  • There is a contention regarding the prerequisites for fluid dynamics, with some asserting that a solid understanding of statics and dynamics is necessary, while others believe that thermodynamics is not required for introductory fluid dynamics courses.
  • Some participants express that thermodynamics could provide a useful overview of concepts relevant to mechanical engineering, but opinions vary on its necessity before taking fluid dynamics.
  • Concerns are raised about the perceived value of math methods for engineers, with some participants describing it as a course that may not provide a strong foundation for mechanical engineering practice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that dynamics is a key course to consider, but there is disagreement regarding the prerequisites for fluid dynamics and the relevance of math methods for engineers. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly concerning the necessity of thermodynamics for fluid dynamics and the overall value of math methods.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the understanding of prerequisites varies by institution, and there are differing opinions on the importance of certain foundational courses in relation to mechanical engineering applications.

  • #31
Cyclovenom said:
What?!, how they cover all the material?!.

By cutting a lot of material... or speeding through it a better word. When I took statics and strength of material we spent a huge amount of time on the statics part, but towards the end the professor was running out of time so he decided to give us an integrated chapter of the strength of materials (mostly beam theory), shear and bending moment diagrams and also lumping together moments of inertia and centriods. I had taken statics at a community college before transfer and was still forced to take that course. Therefore I knew we skipped some chapters that I was covered in my cc statics course. This statics and strength of materials course skipped hydrostatics, virtual work, and not a lot of detail into moments of inertia. The strength of materials part is really basic, like just learning about deflection and solving statically indeterminate problems with it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
teknodude said:
Maybe you should do research with a prof in that area to see if you like. Also internships

It's too late for me to do that. I start my MS program in the fall and at that time I have to decide who I want to do research with and in what area, etc... I just have this summer to read and figure out which one interests me more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K