Considering the change from CMP to AMO

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ggmaybe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential transition from condensed matter physics (CMP) to atomic, molecular, and optical physics (AMO) in the context of emerging research areas such as quantum computing (QC) and quantum information science (QIS). Participants explore the implications of such a switch for career opportunities and personal goals, particularly for someone currently in a postdoctoral position.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Career-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a dilemma about switching fields from CMP to AMO, noting the trend towards quantum computing and the funding associated with QIS and QC research.
  • Another participant, without an academic background, suggests that CMP is closely related to QIS and implies that staying within this field could enhance financial and promotional opportunities.
  • A third participant questions the necessity of formally switching to AMO to engage in quantum computing developments, pointing out that solid-state devices, which are likely to be commercially viable, are rooted in CMP.
  • There is a discussion about the motivations for switching fields, weighing the desire for meaningful work against employability and the urgency of starting a career.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether switching fields is advisable. There are differing views on the relevance of CMP to quantum computing and the implications of such a transition for career prospects.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the latest developments in QIS and QC, and there are unresolved questions regarding the impact of a potential field switch on long-term career goals.

ggmaybe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not have academic background but I am involved in management of quantum computing research in a public institute. I observe most of condensed matter physics have something to do with QIS. I hope you will find your own field has some relation with QIS which would give you better financial and promotional opportunity.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ggmaybe said:
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.
I'm a bit confused here. You are currently in a postdoc (first postdoc?) in CMP and materials physics. And I assume your PhD work were in those fields. Correct, so far? When you say you are considering switching your field to AMO, do you mean terminating your current postdoc prematurely? Or do you mean taking a subsequent postdoc in AMO? What is your career goal after you've finished your round of postdocs? Academia, industry, or government labs?

I admit that I haven't kept up with the latest developments in QIS and QC. But realistically, practical commercial devices are likely to be solid-state devices. And electronic and optical properties of solids (including interactions of solids with external optical sources) are all a part of CMP. So why do you need to formally switch to AMO to pursue developments applicable to QC and QIS?
 
ggmaybe said:
I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field?
What would be the goal? To engage in something more meaningful or to make yourself more employable? Or perhaps it's a bit of both?

In my opinion your best option is to move in a direction that will make you more employable sooner rather than later. The longer you wait to start a career the harder it will be to both find employment and build enough wealth to enjoy at least a minimum standard of living.

Life seems long but it goes by fast. You have to plan for your long-term future
You won't be young forever.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K