Other Considering the change from CMP to AMO

  • Thread starter Thread starter ggmaybe
  • Start date Start date
ggmaybe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not have academic background but I am involved in management of quantum computing research in a public institute. I observe most of condensed matter physics have something to do with QIS. I hope you will find your own field has some relation with QIS which would give you better financial and promotional opportunity.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ggmaybe said:
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.
I'm a bit confused here. You are currently in a postdoc (first postdoc?) in CMP and materials physics. And I assume your PhD work were in those fields. Correct, so far? When you say you are considering switching your field to AMO, do you mean terminating your current postdoc prematurely? Or do you mean taking a subsequent postdoc in AMO? What is your career goal after you've finished your round of postdocs? Academia, industry, or government labs?

I admit that I haven't kept up with the latest developments in QIS and QC. But realistically, practical commercial devices are likely to be solid-state devices. And electronic and optical properties of solids (including interactions of solids with external optical sources) are all a part of CMP. So why do you need to formally switch to AMO to pursue developments applicable to QC and QIS?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top