Constant acceleration ball throw problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an entertainer juggling balls, specifically focusing on the vertical throw of a ball while she runs to a table 5.80 m away at a constant speed. The goal is to determine the minimum initial speed required for the throw and the height of the ball when she reaches the table.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the time the ball is in the air and how it relates to the distance the entertainer runs. There are questions about the correctness of the time used in calculations and the equations applied.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the total distance run and the corresponding time. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct equation to use, and adjustments to the calculations have been suggested based on the total distance.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the total distance the entertainer runs and the time calculations, as well as the application of the equations of motion under constant acceleration.

Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An entertainer juggles balls while doing other activities. In one act, she throws a ball vertically upward, and while it is in the air, she runs to and from a table 5.80 m away at a constant speed of 2.40 m/s, returning just in time to catch the falling ball.

1. With what minimum initial speed must she throw the ball upward to accomplish this feat?

I'm positive the answer is 23.7 m/s.

2. How high above its initial position is the ball just as she reaches the table?

Homework Equations



A constant acceleration equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



After I obtained the speed, I simply plugged it into the equation -9.8(1.2085)2+23.7(1.2085)

and received 14.32 m for problem number 2. Is this right? I don't feel like it is. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Crusaderking1 said:
After I obtained the speed, I simply plugged it into the equation -9.8(1.2085)2+23.7(1.2085)

and received 14.32 m for problem number 2. Is this right? I don't feel like it is. Thanks!
How did you get 1.2085 s?
 
kuruman said:
How did you get 1.2085 s?

Split the time in half.

5.80/2.40 = 2.417, and then halved it.
 
You halved one time too many. You forgot that she runs a total distance of 5.8+5.8 =11.6 m. So the total running time is 11.6/2.4 not 5.8/2.4.
 
kuruman said:
You halved one time too many. You forgot that she runs a total distance of 5.8+5.8 =11.6 m. So the total running time is 11.6/2.4 not 5.8/2.4.

ooh ok thanks! So I need to plug 2.417 instead of 1.2085 into the equation.
 
I got 33.6, sound better?
 
Am I using the wrong equation now? I received wrong answer for using 2.417 in the equation above.

x(t) = vt - (1/2)at^2 + x0 sounds better.

23.7(2.417)-0.5(-9.8)(2.417)^2 + 0?

xo = 0?
 
Last edited:
Crusaderking1 said:
Am I using the wrong equation now? I received wrong answer for using 2.417 in the equation above.

x(t) = vt - (1/2)at^2 + x0 sounds better.

23.7(2.417)-0.5(-9.8)(2.417)^2 + 0?

xo = 0?
You have one minus sign too many. In the equation x = x0+v0t+(1/2)at2 you should replace a with -9.8 m/s2.

Yes x0 = 0.
 
kuruman said:
You have one minus sign too many. In the equation x = x0+v0t+(1/2)at2 you should replace a with -9.8 m/s2.

Yes x0 = 0.

Ok thanks a ton! I received 28.7 meters. sound better?
 
  • #10
Much better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K