Constant Acceleration in a Calculus Word Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an object whose velocity is defined in relation to its position, with the goal of demonstrating that the object's acceleration is constant. The relationship given is v = (b^2 + 2gs) ^1/2, where b and g are constants. Participants are exploring how to manipulate this relationship to analyze acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express acceleration in terms of the given velocity function but is uncertain about how to eliminate the position variable "s." Some participants discuss the relationship between ds/dt and velocity, questioning if it can be treated as a function of time.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting that the acceleration can be expressed without eliminating "s." There is a recognition of the chain rule's application, and while some participants express confusion, others provide clarifications that seem to guide the discussion productively.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to understand the relationship between velocity and position, as well as the implications of treating velocity as a function of position rather than time. The discussion reflects a common challenge in calculus problems involving motion.

preet
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
"An object moves so that its velocity, v is related to its position. s according to v = (b^2 + 2gs) ^1/2 where b and g are constants. Show that the acceleration of the object is constant."

I typed out the question exactly as it is. I'm confused because I don't really get what to do. To show that acceleration is constant, I need to get rid of that "s" variable in the question. Acceleration is = to d(velocity)/dt... but from the given function, you can only get d(v) / ds.

So dv/dt = dv/ds * ds/dt

But how do I find d(s) / dt? Don't I need a function that has position in terms of time?

TiA
Preet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't ds/dt just v?
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Isn't ds/dt just v?

Yes but v isn't a function of t in this case, it is a function of s
 
Does that matter? I mean, a = dv/ds * ds/dt = v dv/ds. If it can be shown that this is constant, then the problem is solved. There is no need to get rid of s.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Does that matter? I mean, a = dv/ds * ds/dt = v dv/ds. If it can be shown that this is constant, then the problem is solved. There is no need to get rid of s.

Could you please show me how;

\frac{dv}{ds} \cdot \frac{ds}{dt} = v\frac{dv}{ds}

Perhaps I'm missing something? It is late after all and I've run out of coffee

~H
 
dv/ds * ds/dt = ds/dt * dv/ds by commutativity and substituting ds/dt for v gives the result I gave.

Is there a flaw in my reasoning here?
 
Ahhhh :mad: It was so simple I missed it :frown:. My frantic scribblings on paper seem so stupid now.

\frac{ds}{dt} = v

You reasoning is perfect e(ho0n3.

To clarify for the OP;

You were right by using the chain rule to obtain;

\frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{ds} \cdot \frac{ds}{dt}

What you (and I) didn't spot is that;

\frac{ds}{dt} = v \Rightarrow a = \frac{dv}{dt} = v\frac{dv}{ds}

As e(ho0n3 correctly stated.

~H
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I feel bad not catching that... it was so obvious =/. Thanks a lot for the help!

-Preet
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K