Construct 2-Fold Cover of M Using H^1(M;Z2)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wofsy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a 2-fold cover of a manifold M using the first cohomology group H^1(M; Z2). Participants explore various approaches, definitions, and implications of this construction, particularly in relation to specific examples like the circle and other manifolds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a non-zero element in H^1(M; Z2) can be used to construct a 2-fold cover of M, questioning how this works.
  • Others propose starting with simple examples like the circle to explore the construction, while discussing different definitions of H^1(M; Z2), including singular homology.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between the fundamental group being abelian and the construction of the 2-fold cover, with some noting that a non-zero element corresponds to a subgroup of index 2.
  • Some participants reflect on the nature of covering spaces and how points in the covering space can be named using additional data from the base space, such as elements of Z2.
  • A participant describes a visualization of a Z_2-valued 1-form and its relation to cycles and boundaries, proposing a method to construct the 2-fold cover by cutting and gluing along nonbounding cycles.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions made regarding the nature of the covering and whether the construction necessarily results in a 2-fold cover, with examples provided to challenge this notion.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the specifics of naming points in the double cover and the topology involved, while others suggest that the universal cover simplifies the construction process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the construction of the 2-fold cover, with no clear consensus reached. There are competing ideas regarding the definitions of H^1(M; Z2), the implications of the fundamental group being abelian, and the specifics of the construction process.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various definitions and approaches to H^1(M; Z2) without resolving the implications of these choices. The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of cycles and boundaries, as well as the nature of covering spaces, which remain unresolved.

  • #31
That's right. Just glue the two manifolds together. (But to be able to visualize this you might have turn one of the manifolds inside out.) When you cut along the nonbounding cycle, the resulting boundary is a two fold cover of the cycle. If the cycle is orientable then the cover is disconnected and if it is not orientable the cover will be connected.

Example. Start with P3 and cut along a P2-hypersurface. This will result in a ball with S2-boundary, say \{|(x,y,z)|\leq 1\}. Take the other manifold to be the ball \{|(x,y,z)|\geq 1\}\cup \{\infty\}. Gluing them together results in S3. (See http://sketchesoftopology.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/two-balls/" for a nice animation.)

Yet another way to think of the gluing, is to again start with two copies of the manifold and consider the nonbounding cycle to be a "magic membrane". If you pass through it you do not arrive on the other side, but instead the other side of the membrane in the other manifold.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Oh bah -- I confused myself by trying to picture things, didn't I? One only needs to specify the gluing locally, so the fact that the cut locally splits the manifold into two pieces is all you need. Alas, there's a few technical details I would to work out (e.g. that the cut really can be covered by open balls that are cut in half -- I'm worried about the possibility of some pathological behavior).

That's why I really liked the universal covering space approach -- I really want to take advantage of something whose details have already been worked out (and is in the domain of things I know a little about). But I suppose I ought to be able to understand this way too...
 
Last edited:
  • #33
OrderOfThings said:
That's right. Just glue the two manifolds together. (But to be able to visualize this you might have turn one of the manifolds inside out.) When you cut along the nonbounding cycle, the resulting boundary is a two fold cover of the cycle. If the cycle is orientable then the cover is disconnected and if it is not orientable the cover will be connected.

Example. Start with P3 and cut along a P2-hypersurface. This will result in a ball with S2-boundary, say \{|(x,y,z)|\leq 1\}. Take the other manifold to be the ball \{|(x,y,z)|\geq 1\}\cup \{\infty\}. Gluing them together results in S3. (See http://sketchesoftopology.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/two-balls/" for a nice animation.)

Yet another way to think of the gluing, is to again start with two copies of the manifold and consider the nonbounding cycle to be a "magic membrane". If you pass through it you do not arrive on the other side, but instead the other side of the membrane in the other manifold.
Now I see what your are saying. So it is like the classical thing of cutting a Moebius band down the middle and getting a twisted cylinder of twice the length.

This makes me think that the general situation is: start with a manifold with boundary and a fixed point free involution of the boundary. The quotient space by the involution contains a hypersurface that is covered twice by the boundary. the hypersurface's Poincare dual is the corresponding element of H^1(quotient;Z2).

It would be interesting to do some examples. If you know of any good ones I'd like to see them.

For starters I am wondering what you get from involutions of a torus as the boundary of a solid torus. Suppose I rotate in 1 direction by 180 degrees and reflect in the other. The seam manifold will be a Klein bottle. What if I just rotate 180 degrees in one direction?

What if I take a solid Klein bottle and take the involution that rotates 180 degrees along its fiber direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K