Construct geometric line with nested root

AI Thread Summary
Constructing geometric lines with lengths involving nested square roots, such as sqrt(2 + sqrt(2)) and sqrt(sqrt(2)), begins with the established method of creating sqrt(2) using a triangle with sides of length 1. The discussion highlights the challenge of extending this method to more complex expressions. It suggests that by adding segments or drawing perpendiculars, one can derive new lengths, though some calculations may lead to confusion, such as distinguishing between sqrt(3) and sqrt(sqrt(2) + 1). Participants express a willingness to explore different approaches and clarify misunderstandings. Overall, the thread emphasizes the geometric construction of nested roots and the potential for further exploration of these concepts.
raphael3d
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
well it is easy to construct sqrt(2) with a triangle with two sides of length 1.
but what about sqrt(2 + sqrt(2)) or the iteration sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + sqrt(2))).

the question is how to construct a line with length sqrt(sqrt(2)) i guess(beginning with lines of length 1), but i am not sure.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
raphael3d said:
well it is easy to construct sqrt(2) with a triangle with two sides of length 1.
but what about sqrt(2 + sqrt(2)) or the iteration sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + sqrt(2))).

the question is how to construct a line with length sqrt(sqrt(2)) i guess(beginning with lines of length 1), but i am not sure.

Just as you can construct a line of length root2 by drawing a triangle with sides 1 and 1, you can then extend the line of root2 to e.g. 5 + root2 by adding a segment of length 5 to the end, or convert it into root(root2 + 1) by drawing a perpendicular of length 1 on the end of the root2 line and creating a new hypotentuse.
 
a prependicular of length 1 on the end of the root2 line means root((root2)^2 + 1^2) = root3 which is not equal to root(root2 +1)
 
raphael3d said:
a prependicular of length 1 on the end of the root2 line means root((root2)^2 + 1^2) = root3 which is not equal to root(root2 +1)

Ah yes, my bad. I thought your way was right, but somehow managed to convince myself it was wrong :(
 
nevermind :)
but you gave me some new ways to think about this...
maybe there are some other viewpoints?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top