Constructing a Rational Function with Given Asymptotes and Intercepts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing a rational function that meets specific criteria: vertical asymptotes at x=-3 and x=1, a horizontal asymptote at y=0, an x-intercept at -1, and a hole at x=2. The correct formulation involves the function f(x) = A(x+1)(x-2)/((x+3)(x-1)(x-2)), where A is a constant determined by substituting x=0 to satisfy f(0) = -2. The participants clarify that the horizontal asymptote remains zero due to the higher degree of the denominator, irrespective of the constant in the numerator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of vertical and horizontal asymptotes
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
  • Familiarity with intercepts and holes in functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of constants on rational function behavior
  • Learn about the implications of asymptotes in function analysis
  • Explore the process of finding intercepts and holes in rational functions
  • Practice constructing rational functions with given conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, particularly those focusing on rational functions, as well as educators looking for examples of function construction with specific asymptotic behavior.

TrueStar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find an equation of a rational function f that satisfies the given conditions:
vertical asymptotes: x=-3, x=1
horizontal asymptote: y=0
x-intercept: -1; f(0)= -2
hole at x=2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Vertical Asymptotes are (x+3) and (x-1). Also (x-2) because of the hole

(x+1) would go in the numerator because it corresponds with the x-intercept. I'm not sure where f(0)= -2 fits in this. (x+2) goes in the numerator because of the hole.

(x+1)(x-2)/(x+3)(x-1)(x-2)

The answer looks like 6x^2-6x-12/x^3-7x+6 so I'm obviously missing something, but I don't know what.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're almost there. The graph of the formula you wrote down has all the required asymptotes. If you multiply the whole thing by a constant, that doesn't change. So instead of
f(x) = (x+1)(x-2)/(x+3)(x-1)(x-2)
you might equally well take
f(x) = A (x+1)(x-2)/(x+3)(x-1)(x-2).
Plug in x = 0. What should A be to satisfy the last requirement?

When you are satisfied with your answer, multiply out the brackets in the denominator and the numerator. You'll see that it agrees with the answer given.
 
I cleaned up my original post, sorry about that.

I figured out what piece I was missing. The horizontal asymptote is zero because there is a higher power in the denominator. The constant in the numerator doesn't change this fact...I incorrectly though the 6 would affect both.

Thank you for pointing that out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K