Construction of a Hilbert space and operators on it

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a Hilbert space for one-particle states in the context of quantizing classical field theories, specifically the Klein-Gordon theory. Participants explore how classical theories can be used to construct operators on this Hilbert space, touching on mathematical frameworks and techniques relevant to functional analysis and quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the Hilbert space of one-particle states consists of equivalence classes of measurable and square integrable solutions of the classical field equation.
  • One participant expresses that developing field theory in terms of L^2 functions is conceptually appealing and may connect to powerful functional analysis techniques, though it remains an open question.
  • Another participant mentions that the mathematical formulation of this theory must be consistent with perturbative quantum field theory (QFT) and renormalization, which has traditionally been approached using distributions over the Schwartz space.
  • References to influential literature are provided, including works by Bogoliubov and Shirkov, which discuss the development of field theory in terms of distributions.
  • One participant suggests that extending the theory from Schwartz distributions to L^2 operators was a significant question in mathematical physics during the 1970s and remains unresolved.
  • Another participant recommends reading "Reed & Simon: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics" and mentions the modern approach of working on Sobolev spaces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the feasibility and methods of constructing operators on the Hilbert space, indicating that multiple competing views remain and the discussion is unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the mathematical frameworks and the dependence on definitions of measurable and square integrable functions. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps in extending the theory.

Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423
When quantizing a classical field theory, e.g. Klein-Gordon theory, the Hilbert space of one-particle states is taken to be a set of equivalence classes of (Lebesgue) measurable and square integrable solutions of the classical field equation, but how do you use the classical theory to construct operators on this Hilbert space?

I asked that question in a different way here (in the Topology & Geometry forum), but got no replies, so I'm trying again here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fredrik said:
When quantizing a classical field theory, e.g. Klein-Gordon theory, the Hilbert space of one-particle states is taken to be a set of equivalence classes of (Lebesgue) measurable and square integrable solutions of the classical field equation, but how do you use the classical theory to construct operators on this Hilbert space?

I asked that question in a different way here (in the Topology & Geometry forum), but got no replies, so I'm trying again here.

I have replied in the math thread.
 
Fredrik said:
When quantizing a classical field theory, e.g. Klein-Gordon theory, the Hilbert space of one-particle states is taken to be a set of equivalence classes of (Lebesgue) measurable and square integrable solutions of the classical field equation, but how do you use the classical theory to construct operators on this Hilbert space?

I think that this is a terrific question to ask -- developing field theory in terms of L^2 functions (Lebesgue-measurable, square-integrable functions) is not just an appealing conceptual aim, but it might provide hooks into some powerful techniques of functional analysis. As far as I know, it hasn't been done. The sticking point is always whether the mathematical formulation can be made consistent with perturbative QFT and renormalization, and to date that has only been possible under the framework of distributions over the Schwartz space, in which case the literature often refers to BPHZ renormalization. Two influential books on this topic are
* Bogoliubov & Shirkov, Intro to the theory of quantized fields, Wiley 1980
* Bogolubov, Logunov, Oksak \& Todorov, General Principles of Quantum Field Theory, Kluwer Academic 1990
which discuss the complete development of field theory, from free to interacting to perturbative expansion by Feynman diagrams and renormalization, in terms of distributions over the Schwartz space. The first is more pedagogical, the second more mathematically technical. Additionally, you might look at papers by Hepp or Zimmerman from the early 70s.

Extending the theory from Schwartz distributions to L^2 operators was, I think, an outstanding question of mathematical physics in the 70s, and remains an open question. Does anybody have an impression or advice on this?

Cheers,

Dave
 
Read "Reed & Simon: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics" for a classic and you could look for "Arthur Jaffe" and "constructive quantum field theory" on google. He has some nice lecture notes hidden somewhere. It looks like the most modern way is to work on Sobolev spaces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
722
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K