Constructive Interference from Speakers on an x-axis

Click For Summary
The maximum amplitude produced from the speakers is calculated to be 12.86 Pa. The user initially struggled with setting up the expression to find the distance to move one speaker, questioning whether to solve for phase difference. Clarification was requested from other forum members, emphasizing the need for an attempt to adhere to forum rules. After further work, the user successfully arrived at the correct answer, realizing the mistake was in converting degrees to radians for the phase calculation. This highlights the importance of careful unit conversion in wave interference problems.
ab200
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Two speakers, A and B, are at the same point on an x-axis and each emits sound with a wavelength of 0.25 m. Speaker B's phase constant is 260 degrees larger than speaker A's phase constant and each produces an amplitude of 10 Pa.

What is the minimum distance you can move speaker A to achieve constructive interference along the x-axis? Give a positive answer regardless of direction, in m.
Relevant Equations
ΔΦ/2π = Δx/λ + ΔΦo/2π = m , m = 0,1,2,3...
The first part of this question asks for the maximum amplitude produced, which I found to be 12.86 Pa. I was able to set up the expression for the combined wave equations.

However, I am struggling to understand how to set up and solve an expression to find the distance I could move one of the speakers. I have wavelength, frequency, and amplitude, as well as difference in phase constant. Am I solving for phase difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ab200 said:
Am I solving for phase difference?
It's not entirely clear what you mean by that. Please post an attempt based on that approach. An attempt is required by forum rules anyway, and it will clarify what you have in mind.
 
haruspex said:
It's not entirely clear what you mean by that. Please post an attempt based on that approach. An attempt is required by forum rules anyway, and it will clarify what you have in mind.
I apologize — after working on it again I arrived at the correct answer. I’m not entirely sure what I did the first time, but I suspect I didn’t convert degrees into radians when calculating difference in initial phase.
 
Thread 'Earthed plates confusion'
So, we know that since the 3rd plate is grounded that means the potential from the right side of the third plate to infinity should be 0, i.e no work should be required to bring a test charge from infinity to the right side of plate 3. Similarly the left side of plate 3's potential should also be 0, i.e no work is done when moving a test charge from infinity to the left side of plate 3. This should mean the fields in these regions should either cancel out or be 0. My teacher told me that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
748
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K