Constructor Theory by David Deutsch

  • Thread starter Thread starter John86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Constructor Theory, proposed by David Deutsch, explores the fundamental physical transformations that can and cannot occur, along with the underlying reasons. The theory is discussed in detail in Deutsch's paper submitted on October 28, 2012, available at arXiv under the identifier 1210.7439. Critics argue that the initial sections of the paper contain excessive definitions and lack scientific rigor, particularly regarding the interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics as a philosophical rather than a scientific principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental physics concepts
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics, specifically the second law
  • Knowledge of philosophical implications in scientific theories
  • Ability to analyze academic papers and theoretical frameworks
NEXT STEPS
  • Read David Deutsch's paper on Constructor Theory at arXiv 1210.7439
  • Investigate the implications of the second law of thermodynamics in modern physics
  • Explore philosophical interpretations of scientific laws
  • Study the role of theoretical frameworks in unifying physical concepts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, and students interested in theoretical physics and the foundational aspects of physical laws.

John86
Messages
257
Reaction score
9
Nice paper by David Deutsch

http://www.edge.org/conversation/constructor-theory

http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7439
Constructor Theory
David Deutsch
(Submitted on 28 Oct 2012)
Constructor theory is the theory of which physical transformations can be caused to happen and which cannot, and why. Several converging motivations for expecting it to be a fundamental branch of physics are discussed. Some principles of the theory are proposed and its potential for solving various problems and achieving various unifications is explored.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
20 pages in and it's all useless definitions and garbage, as expected from what is apparently a philosophy department?
 
I might not understand Deustch's talk in Edge, but it seems he argues that the second law of Thermodynamics is a philosophical law and not a scientifical one, cause we can always argue for some invisible force acting there to correct for violation of the second law. (It's in 14-15 min).
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K