Contact pontential for a semiconductor

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marcis231
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contact Semiconductor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying the correct formula for calculating contact potential in semiconductors. A critical correction was noted regarding a typographical error, where "108" should be represented as "10^8". This clarification is essential for accurate calculations in semiconductor physics. Participants emphasized the importance of precise notation in scientific discussions to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics
  • Familiarity with electrical potential concepts
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and exponents
  • Experience with scientific communication standards
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formula for contact potential in semiconductors
  • Study the impact of typographical accuracy in scientific documentation
  • Explore the role of electrical potential in semiconductor behavior
  • Learn about common errors in scientific notation and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in semiconductor physics, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in scientific research and documentation.

Marcis231
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
SK doping stratified where the concentration of donor atoms = 10^2 acceptor atomic concentration, acceptor atomic concentration of 1 acceptor atom per 108 Ge atoms. Calculate the contact potential Vo at 300oK if it is known that the atomic concentration of Ge is 4.4 x 10^28 atoms⁄ m3 and the atomic concentration of intrinsic = ni = 2.5 x 10^13 and the potential VT = 0.0259 Volt. The acceptor atomic concentration is 10^-8 Ge atom concentration.
Relevant Equations
I don't know which formula that i should use for this question
Anyone can help me, which formula I should use for this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing that might help others reading this is that I think you have a typo: ## 108 ## in the second line should be ## 10^8 ##, if I'm not mistaken.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
805
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K