Announcement Contest to rename "PF Lounge" category

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    contest
Click For Summary
The forum is seeking suggestions to rename the "PF Lounge" category, encouraging members to propose creative and fun alternatives. Participants are sharing various ideas, such as "Eigenlounge," "The Particle Zoo Lounge," and "Schrodinger's Saloon," while some members express a preference to keep the original name due to its relaxed nature. There is a mix of humor and serious suggestions, with discussions about the implications of changing a familiar title. Ultimately, the final decision will rest with the PF administration, but community input is actively encouraged. The goal is to enhance the category's appeal while maintaining its essence.
  • #61
fresh_42 said:
Considering the fetish physicist have to frames and coordinates, we should prefer "Des Cartes".

I don't think I am getting enough of these jokes, If it is not a joke then I am not getting enough of the physics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
pinball1970 said:
I don't think I am getting enough of these jokes, If it is not a joke then I am not getting enough of the physics
Not sure I understood it right but here's what I meant: In physics, everything is about frames, frames and transformations between frames. Frames are coordinate systems. The most used coordinate system are Cartesian coordinates. The word Cartesian is because of René Descartes. And "Des Cartes" is French for "Maps". Too indirect?
 
  • #63
DrGreg said:
So the new lounge will look exactly like the old lounge, but a different size?
That depends on who operates
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and *now*
  • #64
Bandersnatch said:
Potato Couch
Greg Bernhardt said:
Perhaps we can keep the word "Lounge" in the title but can we make it a little more creative?
Potato Cauchy
Lagrounge
 
  • #65
mfb said:
DrGreg said:
So the new lounge will look exactly like the old lounge, but a different size?
That depends on who operates
Sorry, found an error in that statement:

It does not matter if we all commute.
 
  • #66
mfb said:
Sorry, found an error in that statement:

It does not matter if we all commute.
Even if we all commute, it still can have different sizes, and depends on where you enter it, as well as who operates it.
 
  • #67
fresh_42 said:
Even if we all commute, it still can have different sizes, and depends on where you enter it, as well as who operates it.

Im a stamp collector, I need to read my Linear albegra book all the way through I think.

How about the Neutron lounge? No charge for entry?
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and Navin
  • #68
Okay, a bit of linear algebra: Linear operators M have a set of eigenvectors vi such that ##Mv_i = \lambda_i v_i## for some constant (the eigenvalue) ##\lambda_i##. As an example, an operator "mirror the z-direction" in 3D space would have the x- and y-direction as eigenvectors with eigenvalue 1 and the z-direction as eigenvector with eigenvalue -1. "Mirror across the plane x=z" would have the y-axis and a vector (1,0,1) as eigenvector with eigenvalue 1 and the vector (1,0,-1) as eigenvector with eigenvalue -1.
In general different operators have different eigenvectors - if you apply an operator on an eigenvector of a different operator you get something, but in general not a multiple of this eigenvector. There is an exception: If two operators commute, then you can find a set of eigenvectors for both operators together. For operators M,N "commute" means ##MNv=NMv## for all v. For people, "commute" means something else...
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and *now*
  • #69
mfb said:
Okay, a bit of linear algebra: Linear operators M have a set of eigenvectors vi such that ##Mv_i = \lambda_i v_i## for some constant (the eigenvalue) ##\lambda_i##. As an example, an operator "mirror the z-direction" in 3D space would have the x- and y-direction as eigenvectors with eigenvalue 1 and the z-direction as eigenvector with eigenvalue -1. "Mirror across the plane x=z" would have the y-axis and a vector (1,0,1) as eigenvector with eigenvalue 1 and the vector (1,0,-1) as eigenvector with eigenvalue -1.
In general different operators have different eigenvectors - if you apply an operator on an eigenvector of a different operator you get something, but in general not a multiple of this eigenvector. There is an exception: If two operators commute, then you can find a set of eigenvectors for both operators together. For operators M,N "commute" means ##MNv=NMv## for all v. For people, "commute" means something else...

Thank you.
 
  • #70
mfb said:
There is an exception: If two operators commute, then you can find a set of eigenvectors for both operators together.
However, not necessarily eigenvalues. E.g. ##M=I## and ##N=2I##.
 
  • Like
Likes *now*
  • #71
I vote now also explicitly for Eigenlounge

Reasons:
  • It fits, as one of the most frequented forums is QM.
  • It fits, as the "eigenworld" is THE essential part of physics: from classical resonances to QFT
  • "eigen" is probably the most used word on PF (common language out of consideration)
  • It fulfills the requirement that "Lounge" is still a part of it.
  • Edit: And "eigen" means "belongs to", "is property of", "is invariant of self". Sounds perfect.
  • It's fancy.
  • It's short enough to make no problems fitting on the site.
  • EL is a short cut we don't use otherwise.
  • And last but not least: I can pronounce it correctly! :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Klystron, Stavros Kiri, ryaamaak and 6 others
  • #72
The forum at the end of universe, because it shows up at the bottom of the webpage and has a bit of pop culture. It's where we go to relax, not dive right back into physics.
 
  • Like
Likes Navin
  • #73
lekh2003 said:
The forum at the end of universe, because it shows up at the bottom of the webpage and has a bit of pop culture. It's where we go to relax, not dive right back into physics.

Does not roll off the tongue although I like the Douglas Adams connection.
 
  • #74
pinball1970 said:
Does not roll off the tongue although I like the Douglas Adams connection.
TFATEOTU, what's so difficult about that?:-p
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #75
The MC Square
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, jack action and lekh2003
  • #76
The State of Exponential Decay
 
  • #77
The Random Walk Trail
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #78
The Spontaneous Emission Lounge
 
  • Like
Likes Fig Neutron and BillTre
  • #79
The What's ##\nu## Schroedinger's Cat Lounge
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu
  • #80
I agree with @Tom.G and @phinds. PF Lounge is I think the best and is what it is.
It reminds me of great looking women that have found their perfect type hair style ... and they insist on getting a new one! (for a change! ...). When they suddenly (with no warning) they finally do get it ... the disaster happens! and e.g. that's when marital and relationship problems begin ! ... (so to speak)
Greg Bernhardt said:
The category will stay how it is, but maybe we can be creative in its name. I refuse to believe I lazily came up with the best name possible :biggrin:
But you did!

However, if you really insist, I think "PF Lounge Cafè" is perhaps ideal.
The more complicated the more lame it gets, IMO.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #81
Greg Bernhardt said:
Perhaps we can keep the word "Lounge" in the title but can we make it a little more creative?
If it's the PF part you really want to replace then perhaps "Non-crackpot Science Lounge" ...
[That reminds (a small part of) PF rules as a handy echo, so that people don't foget in the lounge one of the main PF directives (and get really carried away) ...]
 
Last edited:
  • #82
How about "Zero Kelvin Lounge"...cause its a chill relaxed place ?
 
  • Like
Likes YoungPhysicist, Stavros Kiri and Greg Bernhardt
  • #83
was this not settled?
 
  • #84
pinball1970 said:
was this not settled?

I dunno...but the threads still open.

It might be "unsettleing" for some that this hasnt been settled !.. hah hah...yea...that was lame wordplay on my part.
 
  • Like
Likes OCR
  • #85
pinball1970 said:
was this not settled?
Most members seemed to prefer the status quo
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, davenn and dlgoff
  • #86
Greg Bernhardt said:
Most members seemed to prefer the status quo
YEAAAAAA !
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, dlgoff, Tom.G and 1 other person
  • #87
YEAAAAAA ! too.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #88
Revolution Now!
Revolution Forever!
 
  • #89
BillTre said:
Revolution Now!
Revolution Forever!
Or, as in this case, revolution never :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and BillTre
  • #90
BillTre said:
Revolution Now!
Revolution Forever!
Conservation of angular momentum...
 
  • Like
Likes jtbell, dlgoff, jack action and 3 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K