Continuity and Intermediate Value Theorem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on two mathematical problems related to continuity and the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT). For the first problem, the user incorrectly calculated the constant c for continuity, initially finding c=-4 and c=8, but was advised to ensure the discriminant is zero for a valid solution. In the second problem, the user attempted to apply the IVT to the equation tan(x)=2x within the interval (0, 1.4) but misapplied the theorem by using values outside the specified interval. The importance of selecting appropriate points within the interval to demonstrate the existence of a root was emphasized, along with the need to verify function values accurately. Overall, the user acknowledged a mistake in the first problem and continued to seek clarity on the second.
scorpa
Messages
367
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I have come across two questions that I have solved, but unfortunately am quite sure I've done them incorrectly. They are related to continuity and the intermediate value theorem.

Find the constant c that makes g continuous (-infinity,infinity).

g(x){ x^2-c^2 if x<4
{ cx+20 if x>4


For this question I found that the graphs is continuous from (-infinity,4),[4,infinity] Then I found the limits as x approaches 4 from the left and right. which ended up being 16-c^2 and 4c+20. I then made these expressions equal to each other to solve for the constant c and ended up getting c=-4 and c=8. Neither of these values work, and I'm not quite sure what I should have done.

Use the I.V.T to show that there is a root of the given equation inthe specified interval
tanx=2x (0,1.4)


tanx-2x=0
when f(0) you get 0
When f(1.4) you get 2.99

therefore f(0) <0<f(1.4)

What I did here just seems wrong, there must be more to it than that, but that's all I can get from reading the textbook.

Thanks again
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) You didn't solve for the constant correctly. There is only one possibility for c (i.e. if you're using the quadratic equation, the discriminant b² - 4ac = 0).

2) First of all, 0 is not even in the interval (0, 1.4). And in fact, neither is 1.4. What you did is indeed wrong. Suppose I say we have the function f(x) = x. If your proof is valid, then there is a number c in that interval such that f(c) = 0 because f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1, and f(0) < 0 < f(1). What you need to do is show that there is a in (0, 1.4) such that f(a) < 0, and b in (0, 1.4) such that f(b) > 0. Given that f is continuous on all of the reals, the following would also suffice:

f(0) < 0 and f(c) > 0 for some c in the interval
f(0) > 0 and f(c) < 0 for some c in the interval
f(1.4) < 0 and f(c) > 0 for some c in the interval
f(1.4) > 0 and f(c) < 0 for some c in the interval

The first three cannot be satisfied, but you can show the fourth. However, just to be safe (since you might get questions where f is only defined on the given interval) pick a and b INSIDE the interval (0, 1.4) such that f(a) < 0 and f(b) > 0. Better yet, find a such that f(a) < 0 and b such that f(b) > 0. This should be really easy, it's just a matter of picking numbers and you should be able to draw the graph of the function g(x) = tanx - 2x yourself and see where you can find numbers that do the trick. If you're allowed to use a calculator it should be even easier.
 
Ok, I figured out the first one, I was just making a stupid mistake, thanks for you help on that. I'm still not sure of the last question, but I will keep at it.Thanks again.
 
Knowing that f(0)= 0 doesn't help you because it is quite possible that f(x) might just rise from 0 up to f(1.4) without ever being equal to 0 again. And, as AKG pointed out, 0 is not in the interval and so does not count as a solution.

Can you calculate f(1)= tan(1)- 2?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
903
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K