Continuity and Open Sets .... Sohrab, Theorem 4.3.4 .... ....

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
This thread concerns an aspect of the proof of the theorem that states that a function is continuous on an open set if and only if the inverse image under f of every open set is open
I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 4: Topology of R and Continuity ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand the proof of Theorem 4.3.4 ... ... Theorem 4.3.4 and its proof read as follows:

Sohrab - Theorem 4.3.4 ... .png

In the above proof by Sohrab we read the following:

" ... ... Therefore ##f^{ -1 } (O') = S \cap O## for some open set ##O## ... ... "Can someone please explain why the above quoted statement is true ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My thoughts on this matter so far ...

Since ##f## is continuous at ##x_0## we can find ##\delta## such that

##f( S \cap B_\delta ( x_0 ) ) \subseteq B_\epsilon ( f(x_0) ) \subseteq O'##Now ... take inverse image under f of the above relationship (is this a legitimate move?)then we have ... ##S \cap B_\delta ( x_0 ) \subseteq f^{ -1 } ( B_\epsilon ( f(x_0) ) ) \subseteq f^{ -1 } ( O' )##So that ... if we put the open set ##B_\delta ( x_0 )## equal to ##O''## then we get##f^{ -1 } ( O' ) \supseteq S \cap O''## ...But now ... how do we find ##O## such that ##f^{ -1 } ( O' ) = S \cap O## ...?

Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This could be wrong, so take the following hint with a grain of salt, because I don't have the time now to try it myself.

I think you can define ##O## to be the union of some open balls that the proof constructed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks Math_QED...

Reflecting on your suggestion...

Peter
 
I think we are dealing with the restriction of [itex]f[/itex] to [itex]S[/itex], so [itex]f^{-1}(O') \subset S[/itex].
Now the [itex]\delta[/itex] constructed by the proof actually depends on [itex]x_0[/itex], so we can write [tex] f^{-1}(O') \subseteq \bigcup_{x_0 \in f^{-1}(O')} S \cap B_{\delta(x_0)}(x_0) = S \cap \bigcup_{x_0 \in f^{-1}(O')} B_{\delta(x_0)}(x_0)[/tex] since [itex]x_0 \in S \cap B_{\delta(x_0)}(x_0)[/itex] and the equality follows from the fundamental laws of set algebra.

It remains to show inclusion in the opposite direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur