Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Continuous 2nd Partials a Substantial Requirement for Conservative Field?

  1. Jun 2, 2008 #1
    It can be shown that if F has continuous 2nd partials, then div curl F = 0. According to Stoke's Theorem, the work done around a closed path C is equal to the flux integral of curl F on a surface sigma that has C as its boundary in positive orientation. However, this integral is equal to the volume triple integral of div curl F. But if F has continuous 2nd partials, then div curl F = 0, and hence the work around C must be 0. Doesn't this show that F is conservative if F has continuous 2nd partials?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 2, 2008 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    It isn't "F" that is "conservative"!

    A vector field [itex]\vec{f}[/itex] is said to be "conservative" (that's physics terminology; I prefer "is an exact derivative") if there exist a scalar function F, having continuous partials, such that [itex]\vec{f}= \nabla F[/itex]. IF there exist such an F, then yes, [itex]\vec{f}[/itex] is "conservative"!
     
  4. Jun 2, 2008 #3

    nicksauce

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    So you're saying that because

    [tex] \int_{\partial S}\vec{F}\cdot d \vec{l} = \int_{S} \nabla \times \vec{F} \cdot d \vec{S}[/tex]

    and because

    [tex] \int_{\partial V}\vec{F} \cdot d \vec{S} = \int_{V} \nabla \cdot \vec{F} dV[/tex]

    it follows that

    [tex] \int_{\partial V}\vec{F}\cdot d \vec{l} = \int_{V} \nabla \cdot \nabla \times \vec{F} dV = 0 [/tex]

    assuming F is smooth enough? The problem is that you can't go from the first theorem to the second. In the first S is an open surface (which has a boundary curve) and in the second S = delV is a closed surface (which does not have a boundary curve)
     
  5. Jun 2, 2008 #4

    nicksauce

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The first integral in the third equation should be around delS not delV.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Continuous 2nd Partials a Substantial Requirement for Conservative Field?
  1. Conservative fields (Replies: 4)

Loading...