Continuous/differentiable functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fk378
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the existence of multiple differentiable solutions for a one-dimensional ordinary differential equation (ODE) of the form x' = f(x), specifically when f(x) is continuous but not differentiable. The example provided is f(x) = x^{1/2}, which demonstrates that while x(t) = ((3/2)(t + C))^{2/3} satisfies the ODE with initial condition x(0) = 0, the constant solution x(t) = 0 also fulfills the same criteria. The general existence and uniqueness theorem is referenced, stating that if f(x,y) is Lipschitz continuous in y, a unique solution exists; otherwise, multiple solutions can arise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with Lipschitz continuity
  • Knowledge of integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of differentiability in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the general existence and uniqueness theorem for first-order ODEs
  • Explore examples of Lipschitz continuous functions
  • Learn about the implications of non-differentiability in ODEs
  • Investigate the behavior of solutions to ODEs with piecewise functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential equations, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of ODEs and their solutions.

fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0
Don't really know how to think about these...

(1) Give an example of a 1-dimensional ODE of form x' = f(x), x(0)=x* where f: R->R is continuous but there exists more than one differentiable solution. Prove your assertion.

(2) Is it true that a 1-dimensional ODE of the same form as (1) where f(x) is differentiable in x for all x has a differential solution x(t) defined for all t>0? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General existence and uniqueness theorem for first order equations:
If f(x,y) is continuous in both variables and "Lipschitz" in y ("Lipschitz" lies between "continuous" and "differentiable". If f(x,y) is differentiable with respect to y, that is sufficient but not necessary) in some neighborhood of [itex](x_0, y_0)[/itex], then there is a unique solution to y'= f(x,y) in some sub-neighborhood satisfying [itex]y(x_0)= x_0[/itex].

In particular, in order that there NOT be a unique solution (more than one) f(x,y) must not be differentiable with respect to y. In the form x'= f(x), you must have a function that is not differentiable with respect to x. Try [itex]f(x)= x^{1/2}[/itex]. It's derivative is [itex]f'(x)= (1/2)x^{-1/2}[/itex] which does not exist at x= 0.

By simple integration, [itex]dx/dt= x^{1/2}[/itex] becomes [itex]x^{1/2}dx= dt[/itex] so that [itex](2/3)x^{3/2}= t+ C[/itex] and, solving for x, [itex]x= ((3/2)(t+ C))^{2/3}[/tex]. In particular, taking C= 0, [itex]x= ((3/2)t)^{2/3}[/itex] satisfies that equation as well as x(0)=0.<br /> <br /> But, obviously, x(t)= 0 for all x also satisfies [itex]x'= x^{1/2}[/itex] as well as x(0)= 0. Once you have two different solutions for that, we can extend it. We can find C such that [itex]x(t)= ((3/2)(t+ C))^{2/3}[/itex] satisfies [itex]x(t_0)= 0[/itex] for any given [itex]t_0[/itex]. But then, since [itex]x'= x^{1/2}= 0[/itex] whenever x= 0, we can "smoothly" attach x= 0 to the left of [itex]t_0[/itex] and then, at some [itex]t_1< t_0[/itex], attach another [itex]((3/2)(t+ C))^{2/3}[/itex] to the left of [itex]t_1[/itex]. In other words, there exist an <b>infinite</b> number of solutions to [itex]x'= x^{1/2}[/itex] that satisfy x(0)= 0.[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K