MHB Continuous random variable question

dylbester
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A continuous random variable x has the following probability function:
f(X)=(X+1)/8
-1<=X<=3
0 Otherwise

1. Find the Pr(X<=2)
2. Find the mean of X
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far, here and in your other threads?
 
mean of X is defined as ∫ x * f (x) dx over the domain of definition of X
∫ x (x + 1) / 8 dx
= ∫ (x^2 + x) / 8 dx
= x^3 / 24 + x^2 / 16 + c
Over the interval [-1, 3], we get:
(3^3 - (-1)^3) / 24 + (3^2 - (-1)^2) / 16
= 7/6 + 1/2
= 5/3

Im I right?
 
Last edited:
Your calculation of the expected value (=mean) is correct. Have you already figured out how to compute $\mathbb{P}(X \leq 2)$?

Hint: use the link between a probability and the area under a density function
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top