Continuous symmetries (Srednicki)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 1K views
LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

In ch22, Srednicki considers the path integral [tex]Z(J)=\int D\phi \exp{i[S+\int d^4y J_a\phi_a]}[/tex]

He says the value of Z(J) is unchanged if we make the change of var [tex]\phi_a(x)\rightarrow\phi_a(x)+\delta\phi_a(x)[/tex], with [tex]\phi_a(x)[/tex] an arbitrary infinitesimal shift that leaves the mesure [tex]D\phi[/tex] invariant by assumption.

Why does this guarantee that Z(J) is unchanged, i.e [tex]\delta Z(J)=0[/tex]. I would have presumed that only changes that are symmetries of the Lagrangian, would leave the action and therefore Z(J) invariant, not just arbitrary changes. Does is have something to do with our assumption that the measure is invariant?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can always change the variables of integration. Then the invariance of the measure does the job. Much like you prove that
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\exp(-(x-a)^2)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\exp(-x^2)dx[/tex]