Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In ch22, Srednicki considers the path integral [tex] Z(J)=\int D\phi \exp{i[S+\int d^4y J_a\phi_a]} [/tex]

He says the value of Z(J) is unchanged if we make the change of var [tex] \phi_a(x)\rightarrow\phi_a(x)+\delta\phi_a(x)[/tex], with [tex] \phi_a(x)[/tex] an arbitrary infinitesimal shift that leaves the mesure [tex] D\phi[/tex] invariant by assumption.

Why does this guarantee that Z(J) is unchanged, i.e [tex] \delta Z(J)=0[/tex]. I would have presumed that only changes that are symmetries of the Lagrangian, would leave the action and therefore Z(J) invariant, not just arbitrary changes. Does is have something to do with our assumption that the measure is invariant?

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Continuous symmetries (Srednicki)

Loading...

Similar Threads for Continuous symmetries Srednicki | Date |
---|---|

B Relation between spin and symmetry of wave function | Apr 4, 2018 |

B Do systems continually evolve? | Mar 7, 2018 |

A Classical Mechanics: Continuous or Discrete universe | Mar 6, 2018 |

I Disctrete vs continuous spectrum | Feb 7, 2018 |

I Understanding Continuous Variable QKD | Nov 16, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**