- #1
johnny_b_good
- 7
- 0
Le Chatlier's Principle is used to determine the direction of a reaciton based upon a stress put on the system. In addition, Henry's law states that the solubility of a gas is related to the partial pressure of that gas. Therefore I present a seemingly contradictory setting:
Example for Carbonation of Water:
CO2 (g) ⇔ CO2 (aq) ---- (1)
H2O (l) + CO2 (aq) ⇔ H2CO3 (aq) ------ (2)
If I apply an external pressure on the system with an oxygen take (pure O2 (g) -- I know, very dangerous, but just a theoretical situation), then Le Chatlier's principle would argue that reaction number (1) would shift towards the right to attain the lowest possiblity energy setting. However, if we use Henry's law, then we would say that the partial pressure of CO2 (g) remains constant ... since we are adding pure O2 (g) ... and therefore, the solubility of the gas would remain constant. That is Le Chat's says concentration of CO2 (aq) increases, but Henry's says that CO2 (aq) remains constant.
Am I missing something relatively large here? thanks for the help
Example for Carbonation of Water:
CO2 (g) ⇔ CO2 (aq) ---- (1)
H2O (l) + CO2 (aq) ⇔ H2CO3 (aq) ------ (2)
If I apply an external pressure on the system with an oxygen take (pure O2 (g) -- I know, very dangerous, but just a theoretical situation), then Le Chatlier's principle would argue that reaction number (1) would shift towards the right to attain the lowest possiblity energy setting. However, if we use Henry's law, then we would say that the partial pressure of CO2 (g) remains constant ... since we are adding pure O2 (g) ... and therefore, the solubility of the gas would remain constant. That is Le Chat's says concentration of CO2 (aq) increases, but Henry's says that CO2 (aq) remains constant.
Am I missing something relatively large here? thanks for the help