Convection ; good conductor & bad conductor difference?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences in heat loss through convection between good and bad thermal conductors, specifically in the context of two cylindrical bodies subjected to a constant temperature at one end and exposed to air at the other. Participants explore the implications of thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity on heat transfer during transient and steady-state conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions which cylinder, made of a good conductor or a bad conductor, would lose more heat to the air through convection.
  • Another participant suggests that a cylinder made of a low thermal resistance material, like copper, would lose more heat compared to one made of a high thermal resistance material, like styrofoam.
  • There is confusion about whether a good thermal conductor would lead to lower heat losses due to faster temperature rise, prompting a discussion on flawed logic regarding heat flow and temperature change.
  • One participant clarifies that the rate of temperature change is influenced by specific heat capacity, while thermal conductivity affects heat flow per unit area per temperature gradient.
  • Another participant emphasizes that in steady-state conditions, heat loss depends primarily on thermal conductivity, while transient conditions require consideration of both thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity.
  • A participant raises a scenario about calculating heat loss during transient conditions, seeking clarification on how to approach this with known parameters.
  • It is noted that a good thermal conductor with a high specific heat capacity may absorb significant heat before its temperature increases, potentially leading to a situation where a poor conductor initially transports more heat due to faster temperature rise.
  • One participant questions whether all good conductors have higher heat capacities than poor conductors, leading to a discussion about the properties of gases versus solids in this context.
  • Another participant clarifies the distinction between conduction and convection in the heat transfer process, affirming their relevance in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, and heat loss through convection. There is no consensus on the implications of these properties in transient versus steady-state conditions, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the initial heat loss dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of heat transfer, indicating that the overall heat flow involves multiple factors, including thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, and the nature of the materials involved. The discussion does not resolve the dependencies and interactions among these properties.

dreamLord
Messages
203
Reaction score
7
Hi.

Suppose I have 2 cylindrical bodies of the same radius and length - one is a good thermal conductor, while the other is a bad conductor. The upper end in each case is kept at a constant temperature T1, while the lower end is in contact with a steel disk of same radius, which is in free contact with air.

Now, my question is, at any instant of time, which cylinder will be losing more energy to the air through its curved surface area? What difference does a bad conductor and a good one make in heat transportation by convection?

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Which one would you think would lose more heat to the air
- a cylinder made up of a material with low thermal resistance such as copper, or,
- a cylinder made up of a material with high thermal resistance such as styrofoam.
 
That's what I'm having trouble figuring out. A good thermal conductor should allow heat to flow through it easily, and hence heat losses should be low in that case. But, at the same time, it's temperature will rise faster, and hence it will lose heat to the air faster. Which logic is flawed out of the two?
 
The rate of change of an object's temperature (for fixed heat inflow) is measured by the specific heat capacity, not the thermal conductivity. If you're talking about a transient heat problem then you need to know this material property as well.

If not then your temperatures will not change, and all you need to know is that a more thermally conductive material will conduct through it more heat per unit area per kelvin temperature gradient.
 
So are you saying that the amount of heat lost to air is independent of the nature of the conductor, but rather depends on the specific heat capacity?
 
Not at all. In a steady state (no changes over time) it will only depend on the thermal conductivity. In a transient case (changing over time, e.g. when you switch the heat source on at t=0 and measure the results) you need thermal conductivity and the specific heat capacity, because the conductor has to first heat up before it can conduct heat to the ambient air; the rate of this heating is governed by the heat capacity.
 
Okay, so I'll ask about when steady state has not yet been acquired.

When I switch on the heat source at t=0, the conductor heats up with time. In this case, which conductor loses more heat energy to the surroundings? How do I go about calculating heat lost by both conductors to the surroundings at any instant of time(or a small interval of time)? I know the temperature at the top surface, the specific heat capacity of the conductor as well as it's thermal conductivity, and room temperature.
 
You need to also specify the heat capacities.

If the really good thermal conductor also has a HUGE specific heat capacity, then it will absorb a lot of heat before it increases its temperature by 1 degree. Since the heat flow is proportional to the temperature difference, you might have a curious case where a poor thermal conductor (with a low heat capacity) transports more heat initially because its temperature rises much faster.

The overall heat flowing through the objects would then be some complicated function of time that depends on the heat capacity and the thermal conductivity. It's found by solving the heat equation.
 
Do all good conductors have a higher heat capacity as compared to poor conductors?

Assuming the above is true, please find the flaw in my reasoning.

Initially, both bodies have the same temperature difference at the ends (1 end maintained at T1, other at room temperature). Thus, in any time interval, the good conductor will allow more heat to pass through it. This means that it will have a higher temperature at a time 't' than that of the poor conductor.

Now, convection depends on the temperature difference and the specific heat capacity. Assuming my first question is true, the good conductor has a higher heat capacity as well as a higher temperature than air. Thus, it will lose more heat.
 
  • #10
dreamLord said:
Do all good conductors have a higher heat capacity as compared to poor conductors?

Not at all! Gases have very low thermal conductivities (due to large mean free paths) and very high specific heat capacities because they have extra molecular degrees of freedom (energy can be stored in rotation and translations that don't occur in solids).

I'm not sure where convection is coming into your 3rd paragraph, is that a typo?
 
  • #11
Ah okay, I see, thanks.

No, it's not a typo. I was trying to talk about conduction and convection in the initial stages - conduction for when heat flows from the top surface to the lower one through the conductor, and convection when heat is lost to the air. Am I wrong?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
455