I Conventional description of the matter wave

George444fg
Messages
25
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Conventional description of the matter wave
I have been working on a relatively simple problem. Just take a quantum wave function for which a physical requirement is that an arbitrary displacement of x or an arbitrary shift of t should not alter the character of the wave, and I want to find the state function solution. A possible guess that works is sin(kx-wt)+acos(kx-wt). I found out that a=±i, and then I have to say which one corresponds to the convention. I said that it must be that γγ=i, because if it was -i, then the time derivative of the state function would have been negative, and using Schrodinger equation that would imply negative energy states. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are correct. The convention that is usually used is that the wave function should have a positive energy, and so the time derivative of the wave function should be positive. Therefore, the coefficient of the cosine term must be +i in order for the wave function to satisfy this requirement.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top