I Conventional description of the matter wave

George444fg
Messages
25
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Conventional description of the matter wave
I have been working on a relatively simple problem. Just take a quantum wave function for which a physical requirement is that an arbitrary displacement of x or an arbitrary shift of t should not alter the character of the wave, and I want to find the state function solution. A possible guess that works is sin(kx-wt)+acos(kx-wt). I found out that a=±i, and then I have to say which one corresponds to the convention. I said that it must be that γγ=i, because if it was -i, then the time derivative of the state function would have been negative, and using Schrodinger equation that would imply negative energy states. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are correct. The convention that is usually used is that the wave function should have a positive energy, and so the time derivative of the wave function should be positive. Therefore, the coefficient of the cosine term must be +i in order for the wave function to satisfy this requirement.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top