In conventional renormalization one is first supposed to compute a scattering amplitude of interest in terms of bare quantities ##\lambda_0, m_0...##, then compute these bare quantities in terms of physical quantities, i.e. ##m(m_0,\lambda_0,...), \lambda(m_0, \lambda_0,...)## and substitute these back into the scattering amplitude. The amplitude should now be finite.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

That is all nice, but suppose one computes the scattering amplitude to ##O(\lambda_0^2 )## and to first order in loops. To be consistent, should one now compute the mass and coupling to second order in the coupling or first order in loop corrections?

And why?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Conventional renormalization to order in the coupling or loops?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Conventional renormalization order |
---|

A Did nature or physicists invent the renormalization group? |

Insights Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Renormalization - Comments |

A Coupling constants with fractional dimensions |

I IR divergences and total energies... |

B Correct English convention for |Psi|^2? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**