Convergence/divergence of complex series

  • Thread starter Thread starter freddyfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Series
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the divergence of the series \(\sum(-i)n/\ln(n)\) from 2 to infinity. While it is acknowledged that the series is not absolutely convergent, participants debate its overall divergence. One contributor argues that the real and imaginary parts of the series form two alternating series, which could indicate convergence according to the Leibniz theorem. There is skepticism about the reliability of the source material, suggesting that it may contain errors regarding the series' behavior. The conversation highlights the complexity of determining convergence or divergence in this context.
freddyfish
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
The question is simple:

how do I prove that the following series is divergent? That it is not absolutely convergent is not hard to see, but that is not enough to prove divergence of the series as it is presented:

\sum(-i)n/ln(n)

The summation is from 2 to infinity.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freddyfish said:
The question is simple:

how do I prove that the following series is divergent? That it is not absolutely convergent is not hard to see, but that is not enough to prove divergence of the series as it is presented:

\sum(-i)n/ln(n)

The summation is from 2 to infinity.

Thanks

I don't think it is divergent. The real and imaginary parts form two alternating series, don't they?
 
Yeah, they sure do and by the Leibniz theorem they converge to some finite number. The book that the answer is taken from stinks in the sense that the key is very often wrong, so I guess this is one of the cases where it is wrong and now I also have a second opinion to take into consideration.

Thank you for your answer! :)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K