I have the following problem: prove that the sequence [itex]e^{inx}[/itex] tends to [itex]0[/itex], in the sense of distributions, when [itex]n\to \infty[/itex]. Here it is how I approached the problem. I have to prove this:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\lim \int e^{inx}\phi(x)\,dx=0[/tex]

, where [itex]\phi[/itex] is a test-function. I changed variable: [itex]nx=x'[/itex] and got:

[tex]\lim \frac{1}{n}\int e^{ix'}\phi(x'/n)dx'[/tex]

Now, can I exchange limit and integral? I would say yes, because of dominated convergence: the absolute value of the integrand is less than, say, [itex]c|\phi|[/itex], which is summable and the limit of the integrand exists, because [itex]\phi[/itex] is continuos. So,

[tex]\phi(0)\lim \frac{1}{n}\int e^{ix'}dx'[/tex]

But can I say that this last limit is zero? I mean, shouldn't the limit function be summable, again by dominated convergence? I suspect that I have a wrong understanding either of convergence in the sense of distribution or of dominated convergence. Can you clear up my doubts?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Convergence in the sense of distributions

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**