Convergence of a Series with Alternating Terms: Finding Values of X

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMOC
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the values of x for which the series \(\sum \frac{(2^k)(x^k)}{\ln(k + 2)}\) converges, with k ranging from 0 to infinity. The context includes the use of convergence tests such as the limit comparison test and the alternating series test.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the limit comparison test and the alternating series test, questioning the validity of using the latter for a non-alternating series. There is an exploration of the convergence behavior at the endpoints of the interval derived from the limit comparison test.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining the implications of their tests and questioning assumptions about the series' behavior. Some guidance has been offered regarding the appropriate tests to use, and there is recognition of the need to clarify the nature of the series being analyzed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the convergence of specific terms and the application of convergence tests, highlighting the importance of correctly identifying the nature of the series involved.

DMOC
Messages
98
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine values for x where \sum \frac{(2^k)(x^k)}{ln(k + 2)} converges if k goes from 0 to infinity.

Homework Equations



Limit test and alternating series test.

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the limit comparison test to test out ak+1 and an and I ended up getting (-1/2) \le x \le (1/2)

Then I had to compare the endpoints. I noticed that the numerator is always 1 in the case of x=1/2 or always 1 or -1 (in the case of x = -1/2).

So by the alternating series test, I concluded that BOTH of the endpoints converges. However, my answer key says that x=1/2 diverges while x=-1/2 converges (I'm correct there).

FYI, for x = 1/2,

I said that an+1 < an and that the limit as k -> \infty = 0, so why does it apparently diverge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm with you at x=(-1/2), but how did you conclude 1/ln(k+2) converges by the alternating series test? It doesn't even alternate.
 
Wait so I can't use the alternating series test with a non alternating series ... wow I'm going to kick myself in the @%$@# for overlooking this.

So I assume I just use like a comparison test for 1/ln(k+2) with 1/k (diverges) since ln makes values of k smaller so the frac. gets bigger.
 
DMOC said:
Wait so I can't use the alternating series test with a non alternating series ... wow I'm going to kick myself in the @%$@# for overlooking this.

So I assume I just use like a comparison test for 1/ln(k+2) with 1/k (diverges) since ln makes values of k smaller so the frac. gets bigger.

Right.
 
DMOC said:
I used the limit comparison test to test out ak+1 and an and I ended up getting (-1/2) \le x \le (1/2)

This is the Ratio Test not the Limit Comparison Test.
Also, you should write a_k not a_n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K