Convergence of Sequence in C[0,1] Norms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that if a sequence \{f_n\} converges in the supremum norm \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}\right), it also converges in the L1 norm \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_1\right). The reasoning is based on the relationship between the supremum norm and other p-norms, where the supremum norm is the maximum among them. A counterexample illustrates that convergence in L1 does not imply convergence in the supremum norm, particularly in spaces where the total measure is infinite. The completeness of \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}\right) ensures that Cauchy sequences converge uniformly, leading to the conclusion that ||f_n-f||_1 approaches 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normed spaces, specifically \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}\right) and \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_1\right)
  • Familiarity with convergence concepts in functional analysis
  • Knowledge of Cauchy sequences and their properties
  • Basic understanding of Lebesgue integration and Lp spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cauchy sequences in normed spaces
  • Explore the implications of completeness in \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}\right)
  • Investigate the differences between various Lp norms and their convergence criteria
  • Examine counterexamples in functional analysis to understand convergence limitations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and anyone studying convergence in normed spaces will benefit from this discussion.

BSCowboy
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If a sequence \{f_n\} is convergent in \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}\right) then it is also convergent in \left(C[0,1],||\cdot||_1\right).

I think I understand why this is true. (In my own words) The relationship between the supremum norm and the usual norm (really any p-norm) is that the supremum norm is the greatest value in all p-norms. So, for all sequences, if the sequence is convergent in the supremum norm it's convergent in all norms on the same space. Is this true?

Also, for a sequence to converge it means
\exists \, f \,\ni \,\forall \,\epsilon>0 \,\exists\, N\ni\, \forall\, x\in C[0,1]
||f_n-f||_{\infty}<\epsilon \quad \forall n>N

This is a given, but how could I use that to prove the implied part? This is for my own edification.

Also, I can think of a counter example to show the other direction is not true.
Such as, f_n(t)=t^n \quad \text{then} \quad ||f_n||_1\rightarrow 0
but, ||f_n||_{\infty}\rightarrow 1
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The first statement is not true in general, only for measure spaces where the total measure is finite.

Counterexample on the real line:

fn(x)=1 -n<x<n, =0 |x|>n+1, and connect up to be continuous in between.
sup |fn(x)|=1, while all Lp norms become infinite.
 


Right, thank you. That is a good point. I haven't yet thought about this proclamation in all spaces. My statement was about the behavior was concerning this normed metric space.
 


Since (C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}) is complete and \{f_n\} is convergent,
we know every sequence in (C[0,1],||\cdot||_{\infty}) is Cauchy convergent and converges uniformly \Rightarrow \quad ||f_n-f||_{\infty}\rightarrow \, 0.
Because of this we also know:
||f_n-f||_1=\int_0^1|f_n(t)-f(t)|dt\leq\int_0^1||f_n-f||_{\infty}dt=||f_n-f||_{\infty}
Therefore,
||f_n-f||_1\rightarrow \, 0

Is my reasoning correct?
 


Yes, You can use the same idea for all Lp norms.
 


Thanks, I appreciate your input.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K