For example, when we solve simple 1D Poisson equation by finite difference method, why three point central difference scheme on uniform grid (attached image) is second order method for solution convergence?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I understand why approximation of first derivative is second order (and that second derivative is also second order because cancelation of first order truncation error term on uniform grid), but I don’t understand why solution also converges with second order.

Basically, this approximation is equivalent to fitting local quadratic (p=2) polynomial through three points which should theoretically yield third (p+1) order method?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Convergence order of central finite difference scheme

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Convergence order central | Date |
---|---|

I A common 2nd order ODE from dynamics but... | Feb 28, 2018 |

A 2D Finite Difference Convergence Rate Issues | Apr 26, 2017 |

Advection equation stability for explicit scheme | Aug 25, 2015 |

Doubt about convergence test on differential equations | Jun 9, 2015 |

Raabe's test says Legendre functions always converge? | May 13, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**