Conversion between lbf and Newtons

  • Thread starter Thread starter abercrombiems02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newtons
abercrombiems02
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I know there are 4.48 N in 1 pound force. The only way I can derive this is dividing 9.8 m/s^2 by 2.2 lbm/kg. The result shows that there 4.48 N in 1 lbm, but shouldn't it be that there are 4.48 N in 1 lbf. Can anyone clear this up or show a better derivation? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the surface of the earth, which is indicated by your using 9.81, one pound force IS one pound "mass". (I put "mass" in quotes because, strictly speaking, the pound IS a unit of force, not mass. When you talk about "one lbm" you mean the mass that, at the surface of the earth, would weigh one pound.)
 
so then it would be valid to say that 1 lbf = 1 lbm*ft/s^2 when g has a magnitude of 32.2 ft/s^2?
 
You are correct. Using Newton's 2nd Law in the fps system, it is expressed as:

F = m \frac{a}{g_c}

In this formulation, a is the local acceleration due to gravity and g_c = 32.17405 lb·ft/(lbf·s²)

You will run into different opinions on the use. I am of the opinion that one should always designate what you are talking about, i.e. lb_m or lb_f
 
Last edited:
This is why the metric system rocks.
 
You couldn't possibly be anymore correct about that statement. stupid slugs, lbm, and lbf!
 
Confession: I admit that sometimes, when I am just not thinking correctly, I'll convert a problem to SI units to do the calculations. Shhhh...don't say that too loudly.[/size]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
22K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
96K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K