Converting between scientific & regular notation, without changing sig. figs.?

AI Thread Summary
To convert 3.60 x 10^5 to regular notation without changing significant figures, the correct representation is 360,000, which has three significant figures. However, this raises concerns about the significant digits, as 360,000 typically indicates only two significant figures. The discussion highlights that 3.60 x 10^5 implies a value range of 359,500 to 360,500, maintaining three significant figures. To accurately express the uncertainty, it is suggested to indicate it as ± 5,000. The conversation emphasizes the importance of preserving significant figures in scientific notation conversions.
rishay95
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


According to the question, i have to convert 3.60 * 105 to regular notation, without changing the number of significant figures, which is currently, as i understand, three.
I'm just really unsure how to do this.
Any help?

Homework Equations


Some said to write out 360,000 & use a bar on the leftmost zero. But, the textbook doesn't mention bars so I'm not sure if we're allowed to use them. Is there any other solution?

The Attempt at a Solution


If it were 3.6 * 105, I know it would just be 360,000

However, that 3.60 is what's really messing me up.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
360,000 is still correct. 3.6 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

355,000 to 365,000.

Whereas 3.60 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

359,500 to 360,500.
 
Xisune said:
360,000 is still correct. 3.6 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

355,000 to 365,000.

Whereas 3.60 x 10^5 means that the actual value is in the range from:

359,500 to 360,500.

Thanks for the reply, but doesn't the value 360,000 have 2 significant digits? That would be changing the number of significant digits, which according to the question, I am not allowed to do.
 
rishay95 said:
Thanks for the reply, but doesn't the value 360,000 have 2 significant digits? That would be changing the number of significant digits, which according to the question, I am not allowed to do.

To specify 2 sig digs, write the uncertainty after the value.

For 3.6 x 10^5, the uncertainty would be ± 5,000.

That means the uncertainty for 3.60 x 10^5 is...?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top