Converting one part of the equation into another

  • Thread starter Thread starter !!!
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To eliminate h from the equation, rearranging one of the expressions to isolate h is essential. The first equation, h = (1/2)gt^2, is already solved for h and can be substituted into the second equation. By replacing h in the second equation with (1/2)gt^2, h is effectively eliminated. Alternatively, multiplying both sides of the second equation by 3/2 can also help in simplifying the equation. Understanding these algebraic manipulations is crucial for success in the course.
!!!
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/8280/picture1mc2.png
In my answer guide, how do I eliminate h from the beginning part of this equation? Can someone give me hints to fill in the missing gap?

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to get rid of h first. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rearrange one of the expressions so that they are both expressions for h. Then equate them (or just put them together) and you will have eliminated h.
 
I still don't know how to rearrange them D:
 
If you have never learned algebra, you are going to have a very difficult time through out this course since it clearly assumes you did. The first equation, h= (1/2)gt^2 is already solved for h. You can just replace h in the second euation, (2/3)h= (1/2)g(t- \Delta t)^2 by (1/2)gt^2. Or, doing as coffeem suggests, since h is multiplied by 2/3, you can multiply both sides by 3/2 to get rid of that 2/3.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top