Converting potential energy to force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the challenge of converting potential energy from a falling metal ball into the force applied to a plastic surface upon impact. Participants explore various methods and formulas to estimate this force, considering factors such as deflection, impact duration, and material properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Assaf expresses difficulty in calculating the impact force from potential energy due to challenges in estimating the time interval of impact.
  • Some participants suggest searching for established equations in resources like the Roark handbook and mention previous discussions on the topic.
  • One participant references Timoshenko's work on deflection due to a dropped object and provides a formula for calculating deflection, noting that it assumes all potential energy goes into deflection.
  • Another participant argues that force and energy are fundamentally different, emphasizing that impact force depends on deformation and deceleration rather than a direct conversion from potential energy.
  • Assaf questions the feasibility of calculating deflection and extracting force using beam deflection equations, indicating a desire for a simpler method.
  • One participant suggests measuring static deflection of the plastic plate to estimate impact force, but Assaf notes a lack of equipment to measure deflection.
  • Another participant proposes dropping the ball on a cantilever beam and instrumenting it to measure deflections and strains caused by the impact.
  • A later reply mentions a spreadsheet created to calculate impact force based on approximated deflection, suggesting a range of forces based on varying deflection scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between potential energy and impact force, with some suggesting methods to estimate force while others emphasize the complexity and variability of the situation. No consensus is reached on a straightforward method for converting potential energy to force.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that all potential energy goes into deflection, the dependence on accurate measurements of deflection, and the complexity of impact dynamics that may not be fully captured by simplified models.

assafwei
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have an impact test (Metal ball falling on plastic) and i have a problem conveting the energy (i.e. height and mass) to the force apllied to the plastic upon impact.

I tried calculating with impact formulas but its difficult to estimate the time interval of the impact.
I tried derivating energy by length (F=dU/dx) but the results seems way off.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

Assaf.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do a google search for force of falling objects. I'm 98% sure there are equation in the Roark handbook, but I'm not sure where my copy is at the moment. If I can find it, I'll post it.

Also try searching here, I'm pretty sure it's been discussed a couple of times here.
 
Timoshenko is the only one that I know of that talks about the deflection/force due to a dropped object, but it is on a simply supported beam. Everyone else seems to skip the load and go directly to calculating stresses. If you can arrange your set up to be just that, you can measure the deflection of the beam at the mid span and use

[tex]\delta = \sqrt{\frac{Wv^2L^3}{2g*24*EI}}[/tex]

Where

W = weight of the falling object
L = span length
v = speed of the object at impact, i.e. [tex]v=\sqrt{2gh}[/tex]

Calculate that and then go back and compare that to the static load required to bend the same beam under static, classical beam theory.

This does assume that all potential energy goes into the deflection of the beam. Of course we know that this is not going to be true. So this calculation would be a maximum.

Without instrumenting your set up with either strain gauges or accelerometers, getting an accurate result is very very difficult (as you have found out).
 
FredGarvin said:
Timoshenko is the only one that I know of that talks about the deflection/force due to a dropped object, but it is on a simply supported beam. Everyone else seems to skip the load and go directly to calculating stresses. If you can arrange your set up to be just that, you can measure the deflection of the beam at the mid span and use

[tex]\delta = \sqrt{\frac{Wv^2L^3}{2g*24*EI}}[/tex]

Where

W = weight of the falling object
L = span length
v = speed of the object at impact, i.e. [tex]v=\sqrt{2gh}[/tex]

Calculate that and then go back and compare that to the static load required to bend the same beam under static, classical beam theory.

This does assume that all potential energy goes into the deflection of the beam. Of course we know that this is not going to be true. So this calculation would be a maximum.

Without instrumenting your set up with either strain gauges or accelerometers, getting an accurate result is very very difficult (as you have found out).

From what i understood, you propose to calculate the deflection using your equation and then extract the force using regular beam deflection equations?
This could be feasble assumin I am trying to figure out the force exerted on a beam, unfortunatley this is not the case...

I was pretty sure there is a simple way of converting potential energy to force on impact...
 
assafwei said:
I was pretty sure there is a simple way of converting potential energy to force on impact...
There isn't. Force and energy are entirely different animals and not directly related. Impact force depends on the deformation and resulting deceleration. You may want to look up a charpy impact test and fracture toughness for more info. Ie, steel can handle a lot more force than aluminum, but breaks under impacts where aluminum won't due to the fact that it is less ductile and doesn't deflect when a force is applied.
 
assafwei: Is your metal ball falling on a plastic plate? Is it a structural component such that you could measure or calculate a static deflection? If so, measure or calculate the static deflection, delta, of your plastic plate when you place the metal ball on the plate. Then, assuming your plate remains in the elastic range during the impact, you can compute the impact force F = m*g*[1 + (1 + 2*h/delta)^0.5], where m = falling object mass, h = drop height, and delta = static deflection. This is an estimate.
 
nvn said:
assafwei: Is your metal ball falling on a plastic plate? Is it a structural component such that you could measure or calculate a static deflection? If so, measure or calculate the static deflection, delta, of your plastic plate when you place the metal ball on the plate. Then, assuming your plate remains in the elastic range during the impact, you can compute the impact force F = m*g*[1 + (1 + 2*h/delta)^0.5], where m = falling object mass, h = drop height, and delta = static deflection. This is an estimate.

Unfortunbatley i don't have the equipment to measure the deflection so this method is not applicable
 
FredGarvin,

Can you please tell in which book Timoshenko mentions this formula?

Can you tell the assumptions behind this? What is "span length"? And is there any assumption on the geometry of the falling object and the region on the beam at which it falls? And why does v = 0 lead to zero deflection (because even if we just place a weight W on the beam, it'll deflect at the midspan).

Srikant
 
I would do this. I would drop the ball on a cantilever beam. Then I would instrument the beam to tell me the deflections and strain it sees due to impact. I would then hit the beam with a force hammer until I got the same response as the ball caused. Bingo you're done.
 
  • #10
I have put together the attached spreadsheet for calculating the impact force of a dropping object. You'll have to approximate the deflection of the plastic case due to impact force and you'll be able to calculate the impact force.

At the least you can get a range of forces starting from zero deflection-bigger force to maximum deflection smaller force.

I hope it helps.

Tudor Agapescu
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K